Kathryn M. Plank
- Education top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Anna M. YoungJ. EssonPaul J. WendelPeter FeltenCelia PopovicStephanie V. RohdieckKathleen HarperLaurie A. Maynell
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers)Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Science EducationNew Directions for Teaching and LearningJournal of College Science Teaching
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kathryn M. Plank
15 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Education 85
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 26
- Social Psychology 23
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 19
- Clinical Psychology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn M. Plank
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn M. Plank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn M. Plank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn M. Plank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn M. Plank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn M. Plank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn M. Plank. The network helps show where Kathryn M. Plank may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn M. Plank
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn M. Plank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn M. Plank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn M. Plank. Kathryn M. Plank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Team Teaching. IDEA Paper #55. | 4 |
| 9 | The Paths People Take Through Teaching Center Services: A Descriptive Analysis | 1 |
| 10 | Can Reading Questions Foster Active Learning? A Study of Six College Courses. | 3 |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Team Teaching: Across the Disciplines, across the Academy. New Pedagogies and Practices for Teaching in Higher Education. | 1 |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Dreiser's Real American Tragedy | 0 |
About Kathryn M. Plank
Kathryn M. Plank is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 117 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (85 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (26 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (4 citations). Kathryn M. Plank has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anna M. Young, J. Esson, Paul J. Wendel, Peter Felten, Celia Popovic, Stephanie V. Rohdieck, Kathleen Harper, Laurie A. Maynell, Alvin S. Mares and Meredith Frey. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Science Education, New Directions for Teaching and Learning and Journal of College Science Teaching.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.