Julie Bliss

83 total papers · 727 total citations
48 papers, 504 citations indexed

About

Julie Bliss is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Bliss has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 504 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in General Health Professions, 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 11 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Julie Bliss's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers). Julie Bliss is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers). Julie Bliss collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Julie Bliss's co-authors include Jon Ogborn, Alison While, Sarah Cowley, Sandra DeYoung, Iain Ryrie, Ben Gray, Pam Smith, Vasso Vydelingum, Julie Green and Peter Griffiths and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, Palliative Medicine and Nurse Education Today.

In The Last Decade

Julie Bliss

44 papers receiving 441 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Julie Bliss	240	171	100	81	62	48	504
Yvonne Botma	214 0.9×	210 1.2×	144 1.4×	152 1.9×	37 0.6×	81	587
Lisa A. Ruth-Sahd	178 0.7×	153 0.9×	102 1.0×	143 1.8×	42 0.7×	63	608
Laureen H. Smith	209 0.9×	236 1.4×	35 0.3×	78 1.0×	56 0.9×	38	587
Susan Diemert Moch	274 1.1×	134 0.8×	41 0.4×	129 1.6×	60 1.0×	32	546
Elizabeth Girot	226 0.9×	190 1.1×	141 1.4×	206 2.5×	49 0.8×	24	610
Gülseren Kocaman	245 1.0×	64 0.4×	97 1.0×	84 1.0×	55 0.9×	28	493
Mary‐Anne Andrusyszyn	223 0.9×	140 0.8×	99 1.0×	189 2.3×	45 0.7×	23	605
Merle Kataoka‐Yahiro	161 0.7×	130 0.8×	43 0.4×	173 2.1×	101 1.6×	41	564
Rona Pillay	148 0.6×	93 0.5×	49 0.5×	128 1.6×	85 1.4×	40	514
Mary Ann Heverly	186 0.8×	112 0.7×	72 0.7×	76 0.9×	48 0.8×	31	472

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Bliss

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Bliss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Bliss

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Bliss. The network helps show where Julie Bliss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Bliss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Bliss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Bliss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Bliss. Julie Bliss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact