Julie Bliss
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jon OgbornAlison WhileSarah CowleySandra DeYoungIain RyrieBen GrayPam SmithVasso Vydelingum
- Topics
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Nursing StudiesPalliative Medicine
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Julie Bliss
44 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- General Health Professions 241
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 172
- Research and Theory 100
- Education 81
- Sociology and Political Science 62
Countries citing papers authored by Julie Bliss
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Bliss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Bliss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Bliss. The network helps show where Julie Bliss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Bliss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Bliss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Bliss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Bliss. Julie Bliss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Community Healthcare Nursing | 13 |
| 13 | Using Culturally Relevant Texts and Grant's Holistic Framework to Connect Indigenous Early Readers to SAE Print-Based Texts | 1 |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Team work and collaboration: the position of district nursing 1948-1974. | 1 |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Julie Bliss
Julie Bliss is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Health Professions, having authored 48 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (100 citations), Leadership and Management (22 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations). Julie Bliss has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jon Ogborn, Alison While, Sarah Cowley, Sandra DeYoung, Iain Ryrie, Ben Gray, Pam Smith, Vasso Vydelingum, Peter Griffiths and Julie Green. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Palliative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.