Julia Shaw
Impact in
-
- Reading and Literacy Development
- Identity, Memory, and Therapy
-
- Memory Processes and Influences
Papers in
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 7
-
- Memory Processes and Influences 3
- Co-authors
- Stephen Porter (3 shared papers)Leanne ten Brinke (2 shared papers)Annelies Vredeveldt (1 shared paper)Michael Woodworth (1 shared paper)Jo M. Hendrickson (1 shared paper)Rashid Minhas (1 shared paper)William J. Therrien (1 shared paper)Youjia Hua (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychology Crime and Law (2 papers)Psychiatry Psychology and Law (2 papers)Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (1 paper)Clinical Psychological Science (1 paper)AI & Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Julia Shaw
15 papers receiving 167 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 48
- Cognitive Neuroscience 66
- Social Psychology 59
- Clinical Psychology 54
- Space and Planetary Science 3
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Shaw. The network helps show where Julia Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Julia Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 8 | The Memory Illusion: Remembering, Forgetting, and the Science of False Memory | 2016 | 14 |
| 9 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 17 | Score - the Coach Approach to Demand Reading | 2010 | 0 |
| 18 | 2024 | 0 |
About Julia Shaw
Julia Shaw is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Disability Education and Employment (1 paper) and Digital Education and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (48 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (66 citations), Social Psychology (59 citations), Clinical Psychology (54 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (3 citations). Julia Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Porter, Leanne ten Brinke, Annelies Vredeveldt, Michael Woodworth, Jo M. Hendrickson, Rashid Minhas, William J. Therrien, Youjia Hua, Suzanne Woods‐Groves and Timo Giesbrecht. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Crime and Law, Psychiatry Psychology and Law, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, Clinical Psychological Science and AI & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.