Michael Woodworth
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen PorterJeffrey T. HancockSaurabh GoorhaPamela BlackDaniel A. WaschbuschDouglas P. BoerMarcus JuodisAndrew Starzomski
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (20 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (12 papers)Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Abnormal PsychologyComputers in Human BehaviorPersonality and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael Woodworth
34 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Clinical Psychology 1.5k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
- Social Psychology 732
- Artificial Intelligence 254
- Cognitive Neuroscience 192
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Woodworth
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Woodworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Woodworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Woodworth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Woodworth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Woodworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Woodworth. The network helps show where Michael Woodworth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Woodworth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Woodworth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Woodworth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Woodworth. Michael Woodworth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 83 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 57 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 108 | |
| 15 | 311 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 159 | |
| 19 | 323 | |
| 20 | 304 |
About Michael Woodworth
Michael Woodworth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (20 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (12 papers) and Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations), Social Psychology (732 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations). Michael Woodworth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Porter, Jeffrey T. Hancock, Saurabh Goorha, Pamela Black, Daniel A. Waschbusch, Douglas P. Boer, Marcus Juodis, Andrew Starzomski, E. L. Hutton and Susan Holtzman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.