Tânia Stoltz

427 total citations
59 papers, 209 citations indexed

About

Tânia Stoltz is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Tânia Stoltz has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 209 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Education, 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Tânia Stoltz's work include Education Pedagogy and Practices (14 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (11 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (9 papers). Tânia Stoltz is often cited by papers focused on Education Pedagogy and Practices (14 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (11 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (9 papers). Tânia Stoltz collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, Portugal and Germany. Tânia Stoltz's co-authors include María de Fátima, Ulrich Weger, Jacques Vonèche, Cristina Costa-Lobo, Gislaine Cristina Vagetti and Valdomiro de Oliveira and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and International Journal of Educational Research.

In The Last Decade

Tânia Stoltz

44 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers

Tânia Stoltz
Hope E. Wilson United States
Belle Wallace United Kingdom
Éva Vass Australia
Tracy Bousselot United States
Donna L. Enersen United States
Virginia Hays Burney United States
Mara Krechevsky United States
Jeanne H. Purcell United States
Hope E. Wilson United States
Tânia Stoltz
Citations per year, relative to Tânia Stoltz Tânia Stoltz (= 1×) peers Hope E. Wilson

Countries citing papers authored by Tânia Stoltz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tânia Stoltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tânia Stoltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tânia Stoltz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tânia Stoltz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tânia Stoltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tânia Stoltz. The network helps show where Tânia Stoltz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tânia Stoltz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tânia Stoltz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tânia Stoltz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tânia Stoltz. Tânia Stoltz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2024). A Scoping Review on the Effects of Music Therapy in the Field of Education. Educação & Realidade. 49.
2.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2024). Consciousness and education: contributions by Piaget, Vygotsky and Steiner. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1411415–1411415.
3.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2023). Creative Activity and the Development of Consciousness: A Discussion With Piaget and Rudolf Steiner. Journal of Psychology Research. 13(3). 1 indexed citations
4.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2022). FANTASIA MORAL E LIBERDADE NA EDUCAÇÃO DE ADULTOS. Atos de Pesquisa em Educação. 17(1). 9280–9280. 1 indexed citations
5.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2021). Education – Spirituality – Creativity. 4 indexed citations
6.
7.
Costa-Lobo, Cristina, et al.. (2018). Intervenção psicológica no talento: resultados de revisão sistemática quantitativa de uma década de literatura.. Americanae (AECID Library).
8.
Stoltz, Tânia. (2018). Consciousness in Piaget: possibilities of understanding. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica. 31(1). 30–30. 9 indexed citations
10.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2016). Barriers to Creativity, Identification and Inclusion of Gifted Student. Creative Education. 7(14). 1899–1905. 9 indexed citations
11.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2015). Skinner and Vygotsky’s Understanding of Resilience in the School Environment. Creative Education. 6(17). 1841–1851. 1 indexed citations
12.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2014). Art just for artists? Considerations based on R. Steiner. 5. 1 indexed citations
13.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2014). Creative Education for Gifted Children. Creative Education. 5(5). 347–352. 17 indexed citations
14.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2014). A construção de conceitos econômicos em adolescentes trabalhadores de rua do Brasil. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 5(11). 2–2. 1 indexed citations
15.
16.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2012). A educação intercultural frente ao princípio constitucional da não discriminação: uma questão de direitos humanos. 15(1). 281–302.
17.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2012). Piaget and Steiner: Science and art in the process of formation. 3(1). 11 indexed citations
18.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2012). PROFESSORES WALDORF: EDUCAR PARA A LIBERDADE É SUPERAR DETERMINISMOS. 2(6). 87–102. 1 indexed citations
19.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2012). O cuidado Institucional na Visão de Adolescentes Acolhidos. 1 indexed citations
20.
Stoltz, Tânia, et al.. (2010). Teatro na escola: considerações a partir de Vygotsky Theater play at school: reflections on Vygotsky. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026