Annelies Vredeveldt

883 total citations
43 papers, 521 citations indexed

About

Annelies Vredeveldt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Annelies Vredeveldt has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 521 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Annelies Vredeveldt's work include Memory Processes and Influences (28 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (21 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (9 papers). Annelies Vredeveldt is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (28 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (21 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (9 papers). Annelies Vredeveldt collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and South Africa. Annelies Vredeveldt's co-authors include P.J. van Koppen, Alan Baddeley, Graham J. Hitch, Pär Anders Granhag, Steven Penrod, Serena Mastroberardino, Colin Tredoux, Julia Shaw, James D. Sauer and Robin N. Groen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Annelies Vredeveldt

36 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annelies Vredeveldt Netherlands 14 368 274 92 89 89 43 521
Rachel Wilcock United Kingdom 14 499 1.4× 408 1.5× 140 1.5× 73 0.8× 64 0.7× 40 643
Melanie Sauerland Netherlands 16 610 1.7× 449 1.6× 53 0.6× 83 0.9× 113 1.3× 87 741
Heather L. Price Canada 19 574 1.6× 429 1.6× 207 2.3× 118 1.3× 78 0.9× 79 818
Rod C. L. Lindsay Canada 10 301 0.8× 257 0.9× 61 0.7× 43 0.5× 41 0.5× 19 406
Nadja Schreiber Compo United States 16 543 1.5× 617 2.3× 165 1.8× 210 2.4× 51 0.6× 43 857
Joyce E. Humphries United Kingdom 9 220 0.6× 156 0.6× 45 0.5× 57 0.6× 75 0.8× 16 316
Ruth Horry United Kingdom 15 377 1.0× 207 0.8× 18 0.2× 97 1.1× 125 1.4× 34 530
Jennifer E. Dysart United States 14 700 1.9× 587 2.1× 50 0.5× 99 1.1× 73 0.8× 24 827
Robert K. Bothwell United States 13 627 1.7× 379 1.4× 65 0.7× 152 1.7× 193 2.2× 18 852
Iris Blandón‐Gitlin United States 15 383 1.0× 466 1.7× 242 2.6× 212 2.4× 115 1.3× 26 744

Countries citing papers authored by Annelies Vredeveldt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annelies Vredeveldt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelies Vredeveldt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelies Vredeveldt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annelies Vredeveldt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelies Vredeveldt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelies Vredeveldt. The network helps show where Annelies Vredeveldt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelies Vredeveldt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelies Vredeveldt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelies Vredeveldt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelies Vredeveldt. Annelies Vredeveldt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weiss, Laura, et al.. (2025). Asking the experts: A focus group and review on eyewitness memory in the multicultural context of South Africa. Open Research Europe. 5. 54–54. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2024). Collaborative interviewing of eyewitnesses: a field study. Journal of Criminal Psychology. 15(2). 210–226.
3.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2023). Culture, trauma, and memory in investigative interviews. Psychology Crime and Law. 32(1). 300–320. 13 indexed citations
4.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2023). Culture and credibility: the assessment of asylum seekers’ statements. Psychology Crime and Law. 32(1). 321–343. 6 indexed citations
5.
Oleszkiewicz, Simon, et al.. (2023). Proximity-based evidence disclosure: Providing an operationalpurpose for disclosing evidence in investigative interviews.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 29(3). 302–319. 3 indexed citations
6.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2022). Legal psychologists as experts: guidelines for minimizing bias. Psychology Crime and Law. 30(7). 705–729. 9 indexed citations
7.
Tredoux, Colin, et al.. (2022). Construction of Facial Composites from Eyewitness Memory. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1392. 149–190.
8.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2021). To watch or not to watch: When reviewing body-worn camera footage improves police reports.. Law and Human Behavior. 45(5). 427–439. 2 indexed citations
9.
Sporer, Siegfried L., et al.. (2020). Does exposure to facial composites damage eyewitness memory? A comprehensive review. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 34(5). 1166–1179. 4 indexed citations
10.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2018). Cross‐cultural differences in object recognition: Comparing asylum seekers from Sub‐Saharan Africa and a matched Western European control group. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 32(4). 463–473. 13 indexed citations
11.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2017). Het rechtspsychologische deskundigenrapport. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 6.
12.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2016). When discussion between eyewitnesses helps memory. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 22(2). 242–259. 24 indexed citations
13.
Vredeveldt, Annelies & P.J. van Koppen. (2016). The thin blue line-up: Comparing eyewitness performance by police and civilians.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 5(3). 252–256. 12 indexed citations
14.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2015). Metacognition moderates the effects of distraction on cognition. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 106–106.
15.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2015). Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more. Memory. 24(5). 669–682. 36 indexed citations
16.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2014). A field evaluation of the Eye-Closure Interview with witnesses of serious crimes.. Law and Human Behavior. 39(2). 189–197. 17 indexed citations
17.
Mastroberardino, Serena & Annelies Vredeveldt. (2014). Eye-closure increases children's memory accuracy for visual material. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 241–241. 24 indexed citations
18.
Vredeveldt, Annelies & Timothy J. Perfect. (2014). Reduction of environmental distraction to facilitate cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 860–860. 10 indexed citations
19.
Vredeveldt, Annelies, Graham J. Hitch, & Alan Baddeley. (2011). Eyeclosure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualisation. Memory & Cognition. 39(7). 1253–1263. 99 indexed citations
20.
Vredeveldt, Annelies. (2010). American Psychology-Law Society Conference. 1(76). 28–29. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel Wilcock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melanie Sauerland Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heather L. Price Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rod C. L. Lindsay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nadja Schreiber Compo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joyce E. Humphries Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth Horry Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer E. Dysart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert K. Bothwell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Iris Blandón‐Gitlin
Rankless by CCL
2026