Jonathan Bostic

595 total citations
44 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Bostic is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Bostic has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Education, 16 papers in Statistics and Probability and 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Bostic's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (22 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers). Jonathan Bostic is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (22 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (13 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers). Jonathan Bostic collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jonathan Bostic's co-authors include Kristin Lesseig, Melissa Boston, Milan Sherman, Sarah B. Bush, Toni A. Sondergeld, Stephen J. Pape, Tim Jacobbe, Gregory M. Stone, Matthew Ryan Lavery and Kristin L. K. Koskey and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education and Educational Measurement Issues and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Bostic

42 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Bostic United States 11 282 106 92 55 38 44 354
Didem Akyüz Türkiye 12 383 1.4× 94 0.9× 101 1.1× 54 1.0× 31 0.8× 40 442
Milan Sherman United States 10 272 1.0× 106 1.0× 93 1.0× 31 0.6× 21 0.6× 23 344
Kathleen Melhuish United States 10 244 0.9× 98 0.9× 77 0.8× 34 0.6× 23 0.6× 35 280
Michelle Cirillo United States 12 310 1.1× 102 1.0× 115 1.3× 37 0.7× 24 0.6× 33 376
Andrew Izsák United States 14 465 1.6× 314 3.0× 100 1.1× 62 1.1× 20 0.5× 26 545
Óscar Chávez United States 8 304 1.1× 128 1.2× 60 0.7× 27 0.5× 16 0.4× 12 354
Victoria Robison United States 12 208 0.7× 54 0.5× 65 0.7× 28 0.5× 12 0.3× 24 291
Seán Delaney San Marino 5 394 1.4× 148 1.4× 50 0.5× 44 0.8× 12 0.3× 6 432
Julia Anghileri United Kingdom 9 396 1.4× 189 1.8× 107 1.2× 103 1.9× 30 0.8× 16 452
Benjamin Rott Germany 12 328 1.2× 92 0.9× 146 1.6× 68 1.2× 21 0.6× 59 401

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bostic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bostic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bostic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bostic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bostic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bostic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bostic. The network helps show where Jonathan Bostic may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Bostic

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Bostic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Bostic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Bostic. Jonathan Bostic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2025). Influence of Language on Multilingual Middle Grades Learners’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Outcomes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(2). 11–42.
2.
Koskey, Kristin L. K., et al.. (2023). Examining how using dichotomous and partial credit scoring models influence sixth‐grade mathematical problem‐solving assessment outcomes. School Science and Mathematics. 123(2). 54–67. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). Defining Test‐Score Interpretation, Use, and Claims: Delphi Study for the Validity Argument. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 42(3). 22–38. 4 indexed citations
4.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). Preparing preservice mathematics teachers to teach for social justice. School Science and Mathematics. 124(1). 48–59. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2022). Fourth-grade students’ sensemaking during multi-step problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 65. 100933–100933. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2022). Validating the use of student‐level instruments to examine preservice teachers' mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics. 122(8). 417–428. 1 indexed citations
7.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2021). Formative Assessment through Think Alouds. Mathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12. 114(8). 598–606. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2021). Gathering Response Process Data for a Problem-Solving Measure through Whole-Class Think Alouds. Applied Measurement in Education. 34(1). 46–60. 4 indexed citations
9.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2020). Informing Programmatic-Level Conversations on Mathematics Preservice Teachers' Problem-Solving Performance and Experiences.. Mathematics teacher education and development. 22(1). 33–47. 2 indexed citations
10.
Lavery, Matthew Ryan, et al.. (2020). Argumentation Surrounding Argument‐Based Validation: A Systematic Review of Validation Methodology in Peer‐Reviewed Articles. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 39(4). 116–130. 10 indexed citations
11.
Bush, Sarah B., et al.. (2019). Five different perspectives on mathematical modeling in mathematics education. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. 12(1). 53–65. 70 indexed citations
12.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2019). Argument-Based Validation in Practice: Examples From Mathematics Education. Applied Measurement in Education. 32(1). 1–9. 13 indexed citations
13.
Bostic, Jonathan, Kristin Lesseig, Milan Sherman, & Melissa Boston. (2019). Classroom observation and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 24(1). 5–31. 39 indexed citations
14.
Casey, Stephanie & Jonathan Bostic. (2016). Structurally Sound Statistics Instruction. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 22(2). 100–107. 1 indexed citations
15.
Bostic, Jonathan, Stephen J. Pape, & Tim Jacobbe. (2016). Encouraging Sixth-Grade Students’ Problem-Solving Performance by Teaching through Problem Solving. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. 8(3). 30–58. 16 indexed citations
16.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2014). Promoting Freedom through Problem-based Learning. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 51(1). 73. 2 indexed citations
17.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2014). Role-playing the Standards for Mathematical Practice: A Professional Development Tool. Journal on Mathematics Education. 3. 3 indexed citations
18.
Bostic, Jonathan, et al.. (2013). Overcoming a Common Storm: Designing Professional Development for Teachers Implementing the Common Core. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 67. 12. 5 indexed citations
19.
Bostic, Jonathan & Stephen J. Pape. (2010). Examining Students’ Perceptions of Two Graphing Technologies and Their Impact on Problem Solving. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 29(2). 139–154. 5 indexed citations
20.
Bostic, Jonathan & Tim Jacobbe. (2010). Promote problem-solving discourse. Teaching Children Mathematics. 17(1). 32–37. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026