Countries citing papers authored by John V. Dempsey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John V. Dempsey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John V. Dempsey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John V. Dempsey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John V. Dempsey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John V. Dempsey. The network helps show where John V. Dempsey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John V. Dempsey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John V. Dempsey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John V. Dempsey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John V. Dempsey. John V. Dempsey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dempsey, John V., et al.. (2013). ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES FOR BLENDED AND ONLINE COURSES. International Association for Development of the Information Society.2 indexed citations
4.
Dempsey, John V., et al.. (2008). Training and Support, Obstacles, and Library Impacts on eLearning Activities. College student journal. 42(2). 630–636.6 indexed citations
5.
Reiser, Robert A. & John V. Dempsey. (2006). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (2nd Edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc eBooks.1 indexed citations
6.
Dempsey, John V., et al.. (2004). Familiarity and Pedagogical Agents. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2004(1). 1164–1170.1 indexed citations
Dempsey, John V.. (1996). Instructional Applications of Computer Games.. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. 1996(1).40 indexed citations
Dempsey, John V., et al.. (1994). Using Photo-Interviewing as a Tool for Research and Evaluation.. Educational Technology archive. 34(4). 55–62.27 indexed citations
11.
Dempsey, John V. & Gregory C. Sales. (1993). Interactive Instruction and Feedback.181 indexed citations
12.
Dempsey, John V. & Karen L. Rasmussen. (1993). Instructional Design and Development Competencies in a New Academic Program..1 indexed citations
13.
Dempsey, John V., et al.. (1991). The IVD-equipped classroom: integrating videodisc technology into the curricula. 1(1). 39–49.1 indexed citations
Driscoll, Marcy P., et al.. (1990). Presentation sequence and example difficulty: their effect on concept and rule learning in computer-based instruction. The Journal of Computer Based Instruction. 17(1). 35–40.11 indexed citations
17.
Jacobs, John, et al.. (1990). An attention reduction training model: educational and technological applications. 1(4). 41–50.1 indexed citations
18.
Dempsey, John V., et al.. (1988). A Taxonomy for the Timing of Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction.. Educational Technology archive. 28(10). 20–25.20 indexed citations
19.
Dempsey, John V. & Marcy P. Driscoll. (1988). The effects of four methods of immediate corrective feedback on retention, discrimination error, and feedback study time in computer-based instruction.3 indexed citations
20.
Dempsey, John V.. (1986). Using the Rational Set Generator with Computer-Based Instruction for Creating Concept Examples; A Template for Instructors.. Educational Technology archive. 26(4). 43–46.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.