Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

4.5k papers and 109.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.5k papers published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 109.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.6k papers), Cancer Research (1.0k papers) and Plant Science (677 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (982 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (857 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (508 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology are Ian C. T. Nisbet, Peter K. LaGoy, Paul Baldrick, Susan Goldhaber, Edward J. Calabrese, Sean M. Hays, Michael Dourson, Kirpal S. Sidhu, Lesa L. Aylward and Richard A. Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.

Countries where authors publish in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025