John S. Oakland

88 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

John S. Oakland
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Management Information Systems 1.3k
  • Strategy and Management 1.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 587
  • Management Science and Operations Research 493
  • Marketing 201
Replace Kaoru Ishikawa with:
Kaoru Ishikawa Japan
Frank M. Gryna United States
William M. Lindsay United States
Bengt Klefsjö Sweden
Elaine Aspinwall United Kingdom
Philip B. Crosby United States
Mahmoud M. Yasin United States
Adrian S. Choo United States
Lawrence D. Fredendall United States
Ching‐Chow Yang Taiwan
John S. Oakland relative to Kaoru Ishikawa Japan Kaoru Ishikawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Kaoru Ishikawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John S. Oakland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Oakland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Oakland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Oakland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Oakland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Oakland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Oakland. The network helps show where John S. Oakland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John S. Oakland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John S. Oakland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John S. Oakland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John S. Oakland. John S. Oakland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 7
4 32
5 1
6 56
7
Contemporary Britain: A Survey With Texts
1
8
Total Organizational Excellence: Achieving world-class performance
78
9
Rejoinder -- Chimera or Culture? Business Process Reengineering for Total Quality Management
6
10 36
11 43
12
Process capability indices: An overview of theory and practice
1
13 5
14
Teaching production and operations management through participative methods
6
15 1
16 16
17 2
18 18
19 14
20
Irish Civilization: An Introduction
2

About John S. Oakland

John S. Oakland is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Strategy and Management, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (34 papers), Quality and Management Systems (22 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (1.3k citations), Strategy and Management (1.2k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (587 citations). John S. Oakland has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Marton Marosszeky, Mohamed Zairi, Steve Letza, Amrik S. Sohal, Robert Oakland, Leslie J. Porter, David Jobber, Joachim Bauer, Michael A. Turner and Feodor Scheinmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Technometrics and Journal of the Operational Research Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026