Ching‐Chow Yang

62 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Ching‐Chow Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Management Information Systems 755
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 676
  • Strategy and Management 700
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 274
  • Marketing 347
Replace Mahmoud M. Yasin with:
Mahmoud M. Yasin United States
Katerina Gotzamani Greece
Faisal Talib India
Roger W. Schmenner United States
Masood Badri United Arab Emirates
M.N. Qureshi India
Bongsug Chae United States
John Mills United Kingdom
Sai Nudurupati United Kingdom
Nigel Slack United Kingdom
Ching‐Chow Yang relative to Mahmoud M. Yasin United States Mahmoud M. Yasin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mahmoud M. Yasin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Chow Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Chow Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Chow Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Chow Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Chow Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Chow Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Chow Yang. The network helps show where Ching‐Chow Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Chow Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Chow Yang Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Chow Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005218
2 2006161
3 2006159
4 2006143
5 2006117
6 2004109
7 200385
8 200378
9 200871
10 200469
11 200965
12 200357
13 201345
14 199744
15 201139
16 200737
17 201136
18 201334
19 200732
20 200629

About Ching‐Chow Yang

Ching‐Chow Yang is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Marketing and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (28 papers), Quality and Supply Management (25 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (11 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (8 papers), Quality Function Deployment in Product Design (8 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (7 papers), Quality and Management Systems (6 papers) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (755 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (676 citations), Strategy and Management (700 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (274 citations) and Marketing (347 citations). Ching‐Chow Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Indonesia and China. Frequent co-authors include Shun‐Hsing Chen, Jiun‐Yan Shiau, Tsu‐Ming Yeh, Ronald Sukwadi, Wen‐Tsann Lin, Yung‐Tsan Jou, Hui‐Ming Wee, Ni‐Bin Chang, Daigee Shaw and Chih‐Wei Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, Service Industries Journal, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, International Journal of Production Economics and Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact