Technometrics

9.1k papers and 984.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.1k papers published in Technometrics in the last decades have received a total of 984.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Technometrics usually cover Statistics and Probability (2.6k papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.8k papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (1.5k papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (1.2k papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technometrics are Keith E. Muller, Eric R. Ziegel, Jacob Cohen, Norman R. Draper, Xianggui Qu, Vladimir Vapnik, Douglas C. Montgomery, Michael Kutner, W. J. Conover and D. B. Owen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Technometrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technometrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technometrics.

Countries where authors publish in Technometrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technometrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technometrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technometrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025