Leslie J. Porter

13 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Identification of the Critical Factors of TQM*19962026200620161996250500750

Peers

Leslie J. Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Management Information Systems 998
  • Strategy and Management 820
  • Management Science and Operations Research 285
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 171
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 104
Replace Jayant V. Saraph with:
Jayant V. Saraph United States
Maling Ebrahimpour United States
Dennis Kehoe United Kingdom
Xingxing Zu United States
George Tsiotras Greece
Huw Richards United Kingdom
S. Thomas Foster United States
Satish Mehra United States
Robin Mann New Zealand
Ronald Siu Man Lau United States
Leslie J. Porter relative to Jayant V. Saraph United States Jayant V. Saraph's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jayant V. Saraph · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie J. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie J. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie J. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie J. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie J. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie J. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie J. Porter. The network helps show where Leslie J. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie J. Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie J. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie J. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie J. Porter. Leslie J. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Evaluating the Operation of the European Quality Award Model for Self Assessment
5
2
Identification of the Critical Factors of TQM*breakdown →
824
3
An empirical model for total quality management
5
4 39
5 163
6 4
7
Process capability indices: An overview of theory and practice
1
8 116
9 95
10 31
11 1
12 5
13 1

About Leslie J. Porter

Leslie J. Porter is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Strategy and Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (8 papers), Quality and Management Systems (8 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (998 citations), Strategy and Management (820 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (285 citations). Leslie J. Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Simon A. Black, John S. Oakland, Mark Finn and A.J. Holden. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Production Economics, Decision Sciences and International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026