Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms
Countries citing papers authored by John P. Workman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John P. Workman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John P. Workman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John P. Workman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John P. Workman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John P. Workman. The network helps show where John P. Workman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John P. Workman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John P. Workman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John P. Workman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John P. Workman. John P. Workman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Workman, John P., Christian Homburg, & Ove Jensen. (2003). Intraorganizational Determinants of Key Account Effectiveness.1 indexed citations
3.
Workman, John P., et al.. (1998). Cattle marketing in Malawi.. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 20(1). 14–16.4 indexed citations
4.
Kreuter, Urs P. & John P. Workman. (1996). Cattle and Wildlife Ranching in Zimbabwe. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 18(2). 44–47.4 indexed citations
5.
Workman, John P., et al.. (1996). Optimum Cattle Management on Utah Ranches. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 18(1). 27–29.2 indexed citations
6.
Workman, John P.. (1995). The Value of Increased Forage From Improved Rangeland Condition. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 17(2). 46–48.2 indexed citations
7.
Workman, John P., et al.. (1994). Improved foothill rangelands--an economic analysis.. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 16(3). 110–113.1 indexed citations
8.
Workman, John P.. (1994). Higher federal grazing fees--impacts on Utah ranches.. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 16(1). 7–8.2 indexed citations
Workman, John P., et al.. (1993). Utah Ranches—An Economic Snapshot. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 15(6). 253–255.6 indexed citations
Tanaka, John A. & John P. Workman. (1990). Optimal vegetation conversion: how much, how often?. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 12(1). 33–36.2 indexed citations
14.
Workman, John P.. (1988). Federal Grazing Fees: A Controversy That Won't Go Away. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 10(3). 128–130.11 indexed citations
15.
Workman, John P., et al.. (1987). Economics of improved production on Utah cattle ranches.. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 9(4). 171–173.1 indexed citations
16.
Workman, John P., et al.. (1981). Net economic costs of the proposed transfer of Utah's federal lands to state ownership.. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 3(1). 6–7.1 indexed citations
17.
Workman, John P.. (1981). Analyzing Ranch Income Statements—A Modified Approach. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 3(4). 146–148.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.