Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games
This map shows the geographic impact of James Boyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Boyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Boyle more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Boyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Boyle. The network helps show where James Boyle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Boyle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Boyle.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Boyle based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Boyle. James Boyle is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rea, Paul, et al.. (2018). Twine Open-Source Software as a Tool for Creating Serious Digital Games with Virtual Patient’s - Enhancing Undergraduate and Postgraduate Diabetes Education. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).
5.
Boyle, James, Michael Connolly, & Tommy MacKay. (2016). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational and Child Psychology. 33(3). 76–91.8 indexed citations
6.
Kelly, Barbara, Lisa Woolfson, & James Boyle. (2016). Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology : A Textbook for Trainees and Practitioners. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).19 indexed citations
7.
Boyle, James & Jennifer Jenkins. (2014). Intellectual Property: Law & the Information Society—Cases and Materials.4 indexed citations
Mackay, Tom G., James Boyle, Martín Knapp, & Michael Connolly. (2013). A multi-strand investigation of microsegmentation of the autism spectrum to enhance the data on the economic costs and benefits of provision. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).2 indexed citations
10.
McClean, Julie L., David C. Bader, Frank O. Bryan, et al.. (2010). A Prototype Two-Decade Fully-Coupled Fine-Resolution CCSM Simulation. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 5450.1 indexed citations
11.
Boyle, James. (2009). Las ideas cercadas: el confinamiento y la desaparición del dominio público. 123–138.1 indexed citations
12.
Bissell, Ahrash N. & James Boyle. (2007). Towards a Global Learning Commons: ccLearn.. Issue Lab (Candid). 47(6). 5–9.14 indexed citations
Boyle, James. (2004). Putting it to the test. Psychologist. 17(3).2 indexed citations
15.
Boyle, James. (2004). A Manifesto on WIPO and the Future of Intellectual Property. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University). 3(1). 1–13.40 indexed citations
16.
Boyle, James. (2002). Fencing Off Ideas: Enclosure & the Disappearance of the Public Domain. Daedalus. 131(2). 13.27 indexed citations
Boyle, James. (2000). The First Amendment and Cyberspace: The Clinton Years. Law and Contemporary Problems. 63(1). 337–351.1 indexed citations
19.
Boyle, James. (1996). Sold out. Computers in Libraries archive. 16(5). 8–10.2 indexed citations
20.
Boyle, James. (1991). Is Subjectivity Possible - the Post-Modern Subject in Legal Theory. eYLS (Yale Law School). 62. 489–524.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.