Sarah E. Pinder

41.6k citations
328 papers · 15.0k indexed · h-index 67

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah E. Pinder

320 papers receiving 14.6k citations

Peers

Sarah E. Pinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Cancer Research 7.3k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 4.6k
  • Oncology 6.6k
  • Dermatology 1.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.0k
Replace Sunil R. Lakhani with:
Sunil R. Lakhani Australia
Britta Weigelt United States
James L. Connolly United States
P. J. van Diest Netherlands
Wedad Hanna Canada
Fernando Schmitt Portugal
Savitri Krishnamurthy United States
Ayşegül A. Şahin United States
Bruce G. Haffty United States
Bryan T. Hennessy Ireland
Sarah E. Pinder relative to Sunil R. Lakhani Australia Sunil R. Lakhani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sunil R. Lakhani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Pinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Pinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Pinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Pinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Pinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Pinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Pinder. The network helps show where Sarah E. Pinder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Pinder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Pinder Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Pinder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 202313
3 20233
4 202221
5 20213
6 202156
7 202127
8 202110
9 202014
10 202050
11 201818
12 201820
13 20174
14 201414
15
Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in-vivo porcine model using a novel magnetic technique
20131
16 201367
17 2011156
18 2005200
19 200152
20 199863

About Sarah E. Pinder

Sarah E. Pinder is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Dermatology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 328 papers that have together received 15.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (183 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (142 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (45 papers), AI in cancer detection (33 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (32 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (32 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (28 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (7.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (4.6k citations), Oncology (6.6k citations), Dermatology (1.1k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.0k citations). Sarah E. Pinder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, J.F.R. Robertson, Carlos Caldas, R.W. Blamey, Arnie Purushotham, Elena Provenzano, C.W. Elston, Claire E. Paish, Dalia M. Abd El‐Rehim and Andrew Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Radiology, Histopathology, British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026