Hugh Bishop

2.0k total citations
11 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Hugh Bishop is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Genetics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Hugh Bishop has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cancer Research, 3 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Hugh Bishop's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers). Hugh Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers). Hugh Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Hugh Bishop's co-authors include Ian O. Ellis, Jack Cuzick, Sarah E. Pinder, Ivana Šestak, Sharon Forsyth, Ian S. Fentiman, William D. George, John Forbes, Nigel Bundred and John Forbes and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Lancet Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Hugh Bishop

11 papers receiving 1000 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hugh Bishop United Kingdom 6 643 524 265 259 187 11 1.0k
Ana M. Gonzalez‐Angulo United States 19 528 0.8× 703 1.3× 168 0.6× 243 0.9× 292 1.6× 22 1.1k
K.I. Pritchard Canada 15 580 0.9× 682 1.3× 183 0.7× 214 0.8× 184 1.0× 35 1.1k
Robert P. Gray United States 15 859 1.3× 718 1.4× 174 0.7× 352 1.4× 181 1.0× 26 1.3k
J. N. Atkins United States 13 643 1.0× 754 1.4× 149 0.6× 270 1.0× 256 1.4× 24 1.2k
Sharon Forsyth United Kingdom 10 423 0.7× 639 1.2× 147 0.6× 316 1.2× 493 2.6× 27 1.2k
M. Stierer Austria 22 918 1.4× 935 1.8× 640 2.4× 263 1.0× 276 1.5× 51 1.6k
Holm Eggemann Germany 22 651 1.0× 694 1.3× 382 1.4× 214 0.8× 238 1.3× 76 1.6k
J. Collins Switzerland 16 806 1.3× 780 1.5× 325 1.2× 322 1.2× 184 1.0× 18 1.3k
Fernando Lara-Medina Mexico 17 411 0.6× 487 0.9× 159 0.6× 145 0.6× 198 1.1× 40 906
F May-Levin France 18 699 1.1× 770 1.5× 158 0.6× 430 1.7× 138 0.7× 43 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Bishop. The network helps show where Hugh Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Bishop. Hugh Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Qureshi, Zeshan, et al.. (2021). Addressing racist parents in a paediatric setting: the nuance of zero tolerance policies. BMJ. 375. n3067–n3067. 1 indexed citations
2.
Naselli, Aldo, Hugh Bishop, Shonagh Walker, & Adilia Warris. (2017). Neutropenic acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) in a 12-year-old boy with T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia successfully managed with conservative treatment. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. 34(1). 24–28. 5 indexed citations
3.
Cuzick, Jack, Ivana Šestak, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (2013). Lancet Oncol 10. 219 indexed citations
4.
Harvey, James, Sue Down, Rachel Bright-Thomas, John Winstanley, & Hugh Bishop. (2013). Breast Disease Management: A Multidisciplinary Manual. 3 indexed citations
5.
Bishop, Hugh, et al.. (2012). Leukocoria and retinoblastoma—pitfalls of the digital age?. The Lancet. 379(9835). 2465–2465. 4 indexed citations
6.
Cuzick, Jack, Ivana Šestak, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (2010). Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial. The Lancet Oncology. 12(1). 21–29. 372 indexed citations
7.
Thomas, Jeremy, Andrew M. Hanby, Sarah E. Pinder, et al.. (2008). Implications of Inconsistent Measurement of ER Status in Non-Invasive Breast Cancer: A Study of 1,684 Cases from the Sloane Project. The Breast Journal. 14(1). 33–38. 15 indexed citations
9.
Bishop, Hugh, et al.. (2008). Audit of Blood Transfusion in Elective Breast Cancer Surgery – Do We Need to Group and Save Pre-Operatively?. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 90(6). 472–473. 16 indexed citations
10.
Baildam, A.D., Hugh Bishop, Helen Gooch, et al.. (2007). Oncoplastic breast surgery – A guide to good practice. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 33. S1–S23. 52 indexed citations
11.
Tubbs, Nigel & Hugh Bishop. (1973). The incidence of post-concussional nystagmus. Injury. 5(2). 148–150. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026