Kerrie Clover

2.8k citations
52 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Oncology top 5%
    • Cancer survivorship and care
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Papers in

Kerrie Clover

50 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Kerrie Clover
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Clinical Psychology 548
  • Oncology 687
  • Otorhinolaryngology 97
  • Social Psychology 323
  • Applied Psychology 78
Replace Takashi Hosaka with:
Takashi Hosaka Japan
Mark R. Katz Canada
Donna M. Posluszny United States
Hurmat Fatima Bhatti United Kingdom
Denis J. Lynch United States
Eleni Tsilika Greece
F. Patrick McKegney United States
Efi Parpa Greece
Birgitt Marten‐Mittag Germany
Irene Teo Singapore
Kerrie Clover relative to Takashi Hosaka Japan Takashi Hosaka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Takashi Hosaka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kerrie Clover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kerrie Clover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kerrie Clover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kerrie Clover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kerrie Clover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kerrie Clover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kerrie Clover. The network helps show where Kerrie Clover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kerrie Clover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kerrie Clover Line = papers co-authored together Kerrie Clover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005200
2 2014139
3 2007119
4 1992105
5 201282
6 201281
7 201365
8 201160
9 201556
10 201052
11 201148
12 201845
13 200938
14 199636
15 201436
16 199933
17 200231
18 201529
19 201227
20 201625

About Kerrie Clover

Kerrie Clover is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (30 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (10 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (7 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (548 citations), Oncology (687 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (97 citations), Social Psychology (323 citations) and Applied Psychology (78 citations). Kerrie Clover has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gregory Carter, Ian M. Whyte, Ben Britton, Andrew Dawson, Alex J. Mitchell, Catherine D’Este, Catherine Adams, Rob Sanson‐Fisher, Jill Cockburn and Nicole Rankin. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Supportive Care in Cancer, The Medical Journal of Australia, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact