Jo Kelly
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Papers in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance 3
- Pharmacy 4
- Obesity and Health Practices 3
- Co-authors
- Paul LittleMichael MooreGeraldine LeydonMark MulleeBeth StuartSimon J. GriffinN DicksonIan A. D. Williamson
- Journals
- BMJ (3 papers)British Journal of General Practice (2 papers)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jo Kelly
20 papers receiving 643 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 189
- General Health Professions 231
- Pharmacy 45
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 207
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Jo Kelly
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Kelly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Kelly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Kelly. The network helps show where Jo Kelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Kelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 112 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 103 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 46 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 91 | |
| 19 | Contraceptive knowledge: development of a valid measure and survey of pill users and general practioners. | 1998 | 11 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2 |
About Jo Kelly
Jo Kelly is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Pharmacy, General Health Professions, Conservation and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (6 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (189 citations), General Health Professions (231 citations), Pharmacy (45 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (207 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (20 citations). Jo Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Little, Michael Moore, Geraldine Leydon, Mark Mullee, Beth Stuart, Simon J. Griffin, N Dickson, Ian A. D. Williamson, C Sadler and Lisa McDermott. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, British Journal of General Practice, Health Technology Assessment, BMJ Open and Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.