Katherine Bradbury

4.6k citations
70 papers · 2.2k indexed · 3 hit papers · h-index 22

Katherine Bradbury

59 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Impact of fatigue as t...692015202620182022250500750

Peers

Katherine Bradbury
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Applied Psychology 566
  • General Health Professions 914
  • Pharmacy 96
  • Family Practice 41
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 64
Replace Liz Steed with:
Liz Steed United Kingdom
Leanne Morrison United Kingdom
Lisa Whitehead Australia
Liz Croot United Kingdom
L. Alison Phillips United States
Paul Krebs United States
Brigid M. Lynch Australia
Melody Hertzog United States
Malcolm J. Bond Australia
Cornelia M. Ruland Norway
Katherine Bradbury relative to Liz Steed United Kingdom Liz Steed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Liz Steed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Bradbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Bradbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Bradbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Bradbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Bradbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Bradbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Bradbury. The network helps show where Katherine Bradbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Katherine Bradbury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine Bradbury Line = papers co-authored together Katherine Bradbury links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20254
5 20240
6 20244
7 20240
8
Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational studybreakdown →
202369
9 20234
10 20234
11 20222
12 20225
13 20212
14 20205
15 20206
16 20191
17 201815
18
The person-based approach to planning, optimising, evaluating and implementing behavioural health interventions
201818
19 201617
20 20167

About Katherine Bradbury

Katherine Bradbury is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (19 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (17 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (7 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (6 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (566 citations), General Health Professions (914 citations) and Pharmacy (96 citations). Katherine Bradbury has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Yardley, Leanne Morrison, Ingrid Müller, Paul Little, Lara Lindert, Sabrina Zeike, Holger Pfaff, Richard J. McManus, Katherine Morton and Rebecca Band. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026