Emily Smith

955 total citations
26 papers, 599 citations indexed

About

Emily Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Smith has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 599 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emily Smith's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers). Emily Smith is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers). Emily Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Emily Smith's co-authors include Shona Hilton, Katherine Bradbury, Lucy Yardley, Paul Little, Georgina Jones, Jane Hughes, William J. Ledger, Jonathan Skull, Neda Mahmoodi and Christopher D. Byrne and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and International Journal of Obesity.

In The Last Decade

Emily Smith

24 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Smith United Kingdom 15 200 196 156 97 84 26 599
Lauren P. Nichols United States 11 92 0.5× 203 1.0× 106 0.7× 30 0.3× 94 1.1× 20 501
Josephine Calvi United States 12 249 1.2× 341 1.7× 88 0.6× 27 0.3× 101 1.2× 16 710
Rebecca C. H. Brown United Kingdom 14 117 0.6× 225 1.1× 43 0.3× 22 0.2× 105 1.3× 32 605
Justin R.E. Manusov United States 7 107 0.5× 204 1.0× 86 0.6× 69 0.7× 72 0.9× 7 408
Anne Derouin United States 15 132 0.7× 276 1.4× 107 0.7× 125 1.3× 62 0.7× 58 636
Dawn L. Comeau United States 12 154 0.8× 162 0.8× 71 0.5× 53 0.5× 94 1.1× 39 515
Alejandra N. Aguirre United States 7 177 0.9× 300 1.5× 312 2.0× 86 0.9× 336 4.0× 14 872
Carolyn Smith‐Morris United States 13 76 0.4× 162 0.8× 84 0.5× 49 0.5× 157 1.9× 38 523
Shanna Fealy Australia 9 201 1.0× 79 0.4× 100 0.6× 55 0.6× 40 0.5× 29 580
Carol O. Cummins United States 9 145 0.7× 217 1.1× 86 0.6× 60 0.6× 74 0.9× 12 515

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Smith. The network helps show where Emily Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Smith. Emily Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Emily, et al.. (2024). Early years pharmacist retention – a listening exercise. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 32(Supplement_2). ii29–ii30.
3.
Smith, Emily & Sarah L. Buchan. (2023). Skewed perception of personal behaviour as a contributor to antibiotic resistance and underestimation of the risks. PLoS ONE. 18(11). e0293186–e0293186. 3 indexed citations
4.
Munro‐Kramer, Michelle L., et al.. (2023). Creating a tool to understand university students’ experiences regarding inappropriate, disrespectful, and coercive (IDC) healthcare interactions. Journal of American College Health. 73(5). 2226–2235.
5.
He, Siran & Emily Smith. (2021). Meta-research on the evidence informing micronutrient dietary reference intakes - project files. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Emily, Jane Barlow, Nuala Livingstone, et al.. (2019). Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019(11). CD012348–CD012348. 35 indexed citations
7.
Standiford, Debra A., Franziska K. Bishop, Joan Thomas, et al.. (2018). Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 12. 68–75. 6 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Emily, Katherine Bradbury, Lisa Benz Scott, et al.. (2017). Providing online weight management in Primary Care: a mixed methods process evaluation of healthcare practitioners’ experiences of using and supporting patients using POWeR+. Implementation Science. 12(1). 69–69. 13 indexed citations
9.
Frounfelker, Rochelle L., et al.. (2017). “We would never forget who we are”: resettlement, cultural negotiation, and family relationships among Somali Bantu refugees. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 26(11). 1387–1400. 26 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Georgina, Jane Hughes, Neda Mahmoodi, et al.. (2017). What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?. Human Reproduction Update. 23(4). 433–457. 90 indexed citations
11.
Little, Paul, Beth Stuart, Richard Hobbs, et al.. (2017). Randomised controlled trial and economic analysis of an internet-based weight management programme: POWeR+ (Positive Online Weight Reduction). Health Technology Assessment. 21(4). 1–62. 29 indexed citations
12.
Sweeting, Helen, et al.. (2016). ‘Now I care’: a qualitative study of how overweight adolescents managed their weight in the transition to adulthood. BMJ Open. 6(11). e010774–e010774. 16 indexed citations
13.
Little, Paul, Beth Stuart, Richard Hobbs, et al.. (2016). An internet-based intervention with brief nurse support to manage obesity in primary care (POWeR+): a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 4(10). 821–828. 75 indexed citations
14.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2015). A Visualization Tool to Analyse Usage of Web-Based Interventions: The Example of Positive Online Weight Reduction (POWeR). JMIR Human Factors. 2(1). e8–e8. 25 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Emily, et al.. (2015). The Impact of a Fruit and Vegetable Intervention on Children and Caregivers. American Journal of Health Education. 46(6). 316–322. 6 indexed citations
16.
Yardley, Lucy, Lisa J. Ware, Emily Smith, et al.. (2014). Randomised controlled feasibility trial of a web-based weight management intervention with nurse support for obese patients in primary care. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 11(1). 67–67. 64 indexed citations
17.
Hilton, Shona, Chris Patterson, Emily Smith, Helen Bedford, & Kate Hunt. (2013). Teenagers’ understandings of and attitudes towards vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases: A qualitative study. Vaccine. 31(22). 2543–2550. 31 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Emily, Helen Sweeting, & Charlotte Wright. (2012). ‘Do I care?’ Young adults' recalled experiences of early adolescent overweight and obesity: a qualitative study. International Journal of Obesity. 37(2). 303–308. 16 indexed citations
20.
Hilton, Shona & Emily Smith. (2010). Public views of the uk media and government reaction to the 2009 swine flu pandemic. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 697–697. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026