Emily Smith
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Shona Hilton (3 shared papers)Lucy Yardley (6 shared papers)Katherine Bradbury (6 shared papers)Paul Little (5 shared papers)William J. Ledger (1 shared paper)Jane Hughes (1 shared paper)Jonathan Skull (1 shared paper)Georgina Jones (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Vaccine (2 papers)European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)Diabetic Medicine (1 paper)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Emily Smith
25 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Pharmacy 37
- Applied Psychology 31
- Health 46
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 149
- General Health Professions 111
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Smith. The network helps show where Emily Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 93 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 4 |
About Emily Smith
Emily Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper), Policing Practices and Perceptions (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Water Access (1 paper) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (37 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Health (46 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (149 citations) and General Health Professions (111 citations). Emily Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Shona Hilton, Lucy Yardley, Katherine Bradbury, Paul Little, William J. Ledger, Jane Hughes, Jonathan Skull, Georgina Jones, Neda Mahmoodi and Richard Hobbs. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Health Technology Assessment, Diabetic Medicine and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.