Beth Stuart
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Dermatology top 0.5%
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Papers in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance 23
- Dermatology 30
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases 22
- Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects 8
- Co-authors
- Michael Moore (68 shared papers)Paul S Little (94 shared papers)Lucy Yardley (32 shared papers)Tony Kendrick (13 shared papers)Adam W A Geraghty (22 shared papers)Mark Mullee (12 shared papers)Lidia Panico (2 shared papers)Mark T. Lown (13 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (30 papers)British Journal of General Practice (16 papers)PLoS ONE (13 papers)BMJ (10 papers)British Journal of Dermatology (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Beth Stuart
224 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 881
- Dermatology 494
- Applied Psychology 87
- General Health Professions 317
- Pharmacology 159
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Stuart
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Stuart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Stuart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Stuart. The network helps show where Beth Stuart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 238 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 354 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 201 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 194 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 181 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 171 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 153 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 141 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 133 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 121 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 117 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 111 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 97 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 88 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 85 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 82 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 79 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 76 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 76 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 72 |
About Beth Stuart
Beth Stuart is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Dermatology, Pharmacology, Epidemiology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 238 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (23 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (22 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (8 papers), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (8 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (4 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (881 citations), Dermatology (494 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), General Health Professions (317 citations) and Pharmacology (159 citations). Beth Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael Moore, Paul S Little, Lucy Yardley, Tony Kendrick, Adam W A Geraghty, Mark Mullee, Lidia Panico, Mark T. Lown, Hazel Everitt and Geraldine Leydon. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of General Practice, PLoS ONE, BMJ and British Journal of Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.