James Raftery

11.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
135 papers, 5.8k citations indexed

About

James Raftery is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, James Raftery has authored 135 papers receiving a total of 5.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 34 papers in General Health Professions and 23 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in James Raftery's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (49 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (16 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (15 papers). James Raftery is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (49 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (16 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (15 papers). James Raftery collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. James Raftery's co-authors include Richard Hobbs, Jonathan Mant, Guiqing Yao, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Stirling Bryan, Ellen Murray, Sue Jowett, Stephen Palmer, Michael Davies and Andrew Stevens and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

James Raftery

132 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial

2004 612 citations James Raftery et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James Raftery United Kingdom	40	1.5k	1.2k	1.1k	662	542	135	5.8k
John Concato United States	23	892 0.6×	831 0.7×	811 0.8×	876 1.3×	334 0.6×	38	6.2k
William H. Crown United States	36	740 0.5×	1.2k 1.0×	684 0.6×	850 1.3×	540 1.0×	124	5.5k
Mary K. Goldstein United States	39	1.2k 0.8×	1.0k 0.8×	1.4k 1.3×	1.2k 1.7×	282 0.5×	161	5.4k
Dyfrig Hughes United Kingdom	47	928 0.6×	2.4k 1.9×	1.2k 1.1×	873 1.3×	536 1.0×	260	9.0k
Sue Jowett United Kingdom	37	1.8k 1.2×	890 0.7×	999 0.9×	888 1.3×	299 0.6×	183	5.8k
Steven A. Grover Canada	36	1.1k 0.7×	943 0.8×	693 0.7×	690 1.0×	323 0.6×	113	5.2k
Tim Friede Germany	45	959 0.6×	649 0.5×	514 0.5×	422 0.6×	425 0.8×	331	7.5k
Frank W. Rockhold United States	26	793 0.5×	615 0.5×	711 0.7×	885 1.3×	562 1.0×	125	6.4k
Nirav R. Shah United States	32	628 0.4×	812 0.7×	1.0k 1.0×	1.0k 1.5×	603 1.1×	128	6.0k
Tom Marshall United Kingdom	42	1.6k 1.0×	1.1k 0.9×	1.1k 1.1×	1.0k 1.6×	800 1.5×	250	7.3k

Countries citing papers authored by James Raftery

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Raftery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Raftery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Raftery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Raftery

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Raftery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Raftery. The network helps show where James Raftery may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Raftery

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Raftery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Raftery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Raftery. James Raftery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Yardley, Lucy, Katherine Morton, Kate Greenwell, et al.. (2022). Digital interventions for hypertension and asthma to support patient self-management in primary care: the DIPSS research programme including two RCTs. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(11). 1–108. 2 indexed citations

Drahota, Amy, Lambert Felix, James Raftery, et al.. (2022). Shock-absorbing flooring for fall-related injury prevention in older adults and staff in hospitals and care homes: the SAFEST systematic review. Health Technology Assessment. 26(5). 1–196. 8 indexed citations

Drahota, Amy, James Raftery, Chantelle C. Lachance, et al.. (2021). Shock-absorbing flooring for older adults and staff in hospitals and care homes: a mixed methods systematic review (The SAFEST Review). Health Technology Assessment. 1 indexed citations

Drahota, Amy, Lambert Felix, Chantelle C. Lachance, et al.. (2020). Protocol for the SAFEST review: the Shock-Absorbing Flooring Effectiveness SysTematic review including older adults and staff in hospitals and care homes. BMJ Open. 10(2). e032315–e032315. 4 indexed citations

Ainsworth, Ben, Kate Greenwell, Beth Stuart, et al.. (2019). Feasibility trial of a digital self-management intervention ‘My Breathing Matters’ to improve asthma-related quality of life for UK primary care patients with asthma. BMJ Open. 9(11). e032465–e032465. 22 indexed citations

Drahota, Amy, et al.. (2019). The SAFEST Review: The Shock-Absorbing Flooring Effectiveness SysTematic Review including older adults and staff in care settings. Health Technology Assessment. 1 indexed citations

Morton, Katherine, Katherine Bradbury, Rebecca Band, et al.. (2018). Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK. BMJ Open. 8(5). e020843–e020843. 15 indexed citations

Band, Rebecca, Katherine Morton, Beth Stuart, et al.. (2016). Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) digital intervention for self-management of uncontrolled, essential hypertension: a protocol for the randomised controlled HOME BP trial. BMJ Open. 6(11). e012684–e012684. 17 indexed citations

Morgan, John M., Borislav D. Dimitrov, Jas Gill, et al.. (2014). Rationale and Study Design of the REM-HF Study: Remote Management of Heart Failure Using Implanted Devices and Formalized Follow-Up Procedures. European Journal of Heart Failure. 16(9). 1039–1045. 25 indexed citations

10.

Little, Paul, Richard Hobbs, Michael Moore, et al.. (2014). The incidence and clinical variables associated with streptococcal throat infections. Health Technology Assessment. 18. 11–20. 2 indexed citations

11.

Hanney, Stephen, et al.. (2007). An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Health Technology Assessment. 11(53). iii–iv, ix. 100 indexed citations

12.

Wilson, Jayne S., Guiqing Yao, James Raftery, et al.. (2007). A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment. Health Technology Assessment. 11(13). 1–202, iii. 135 indexed citations

13.

Jolly, Kate, R. Taylor, G. Y. H. Lip, et al.. (2007). The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technology Assessment. 11(35). 1–118. 159 indexed citations

14.

Yao, Guiqing, Esther Albon, Yaser Adi, et al.. (2006). A systematic review and economic model of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplantation in children. Health Technology Assessment. 10(49). iii–iv, ix. 32 indexed citations

15.

Yao, Guiqing, et al.. (2005). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modelling study. Health Technology Assessment. 9(21). 1–179, iii. 164 indexed citations

16.

Hobbs, Richard, David Fitzmaurice, Jonathan Mant, et al.. (2005). A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study. Health Technology Assessment. 9(40). iii–iv, ix. 305 indexed citations

17.

Bevan, Gwyn, Sally Wyke, Nicholas Mays, et al.. (1999). Developing primary care in the new NHS: lessons from total purchasing. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 10 indexed citations

18.

Robison, Judy, Ray Robinson, James Raftery, & Hugh McLeod. (1998). Contracting by total purchasing pilot projects 1997-1998. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 9 indexed citations

19.

Edwards, John N. & James Raftery. (1995). Acute beds. Bedtime stories.. PubMed. 105(5442). 26–8. 1 indexed citations

20.

Raftery, James, et al.. (1994). Perspectives on purchasing. Banking on knowledge.. PubMed. 104(5389). 28–30. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact