Jenny Moffett
- Education top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Media Technology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Aileen C. MillDavid BartramCarol GrayJennifer HammondTeresa PawlikowskaPaul MurphySusan M. MatthewAnne Fawcett
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers)Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (5 papers)Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- IrelandSaint Kitts and NevisNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jenny Moffett
18 papers receiving 450 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Education 290
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 186
- Speech and Hearing 60
- General Health Professions 51
- Media Technology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Jenny Moffett
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenny Moffett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenny Moffett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenny Moffett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jenny Moffett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenny Moffett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenny Moffett. The network helps show where Jenny Moffett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenny Moffett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenny Moffett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenny Moffett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenny Moffett. Jenny Moffett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 98 | |
| 16 | 220 | |
| 17 | Communications Handbook for Clinical Trials: Strategies, Tips and Tools to Manage Controversy, Convey Your Message and Disseminate Results | 2 |
| 18 | Handbook of veterinary communication skills | 26 |
About Jenny Moffett
Jenny Moffett is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Family Practice and Speech and Hearing, having authored 18 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (5 papers) and Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (28 citations), Education (290 citations) and Speech and Hearing (60 citations). Jenny Moffett has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Saint Kitts and Nevis and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Aileen C. Mill, David Bartram, Carol Gray, Jennifer Hammond, Teresa Pawlikowska, Paul Murphy, Susan M. Matthew, Anne Fawcett, John Berezowski and Sinéad T. Loughran. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education and Advances in Health Sciences Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.