Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings?
1998485 citationsAlison Mackey, Jenefer PhilpModern Language Journalprofile →
Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
2016390 citationsJenefer Philp, Susan DuchesneAnnual Review of Applied Linguisticsprofile →
Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction
2006359 citationsJenefer Philp et al.Systemprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenefer Philp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenefer Philp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenefer Philp more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenefer Philp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenefer Philp. The network helps show where Jenefer Philp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenefer Philp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenefer Philp.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenefer Philp based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jenefer Philp. Jenefer Philp is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Philp, Jenefer & Susan Duchesne. (2016). Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 36. 50–72.390 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Philp, Jenefer, Alison Mackey, & Yasser Teimouri. (2015). The relationships amongst working memory, cognitive creativity and second language production during communicative tasks. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).2 indexed citations
Oliver, Rhonda & Jenefer Philp. (2014). Focus on Oral Interaction: Research-led guide exploring the role of oral interaction for second language learning. eSpace (Curtin University).1 indexed citations
Rubie‐Davies, Christine M., et al.. (2011). Do beliefs about NCEA and its washback effects vary depending on subject. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. 46(2). 47.3 indexed citations
10.
Philp, Jenefer & Alison Mackey. (2010). Interaction research : What can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa)?. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).11 indexed citations
11.
Philp, Jenefer, et al.. (2010). Rehearsing, conversing, working it out. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 33(3). 28.1–28.25.12 indexed citations
Philp, Jenefer. (2003). CONSTRAINTS ON “NOTICING THE GAP”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 25(1). 99–126.265 indexed citations
19.
Mackey, Alison & Jenefer Philp. (1998). Conversational Interaction and Development and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings?.. Modern Language Journal. 82(3).2 indexed citations
20.
Mackey, Alison & Jenefer Philp. (1998). Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings?. Modern Language Journal. 82(3). 338–356.485 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.