Jane O’Brien

63 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2019 · 402 citations
4022019202620212023100200300400

Peers

Jane O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Internal Medicine 106
  • Occupational Therapy 113
  • Applied Psychology 109
  • Speech and Hearing 120
  • Rehabilitation 114
Replace Jean‐François Chenot with:
Jean‐François Chenot Germany
George Mnatzaganian Australia
Asirvatham Alwin Robert Saudi Arabia
Ann P. Rafferty United States
Noriyuki Nakanishi Japan
Stephanie Chang United States
Kozo Tatara Japan
Gloria Bueno Spain
Satoshi Seino Japan
Michael M. Kochen Germany
Jane O’Brien relative to Jean‐François Chenot Germany Jean‐François Chenot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Jean‐François Chenot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane O’Brien. The network helps show where Jane O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane O’Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane O’Brien Line = papers co-authored together Jane O’Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2019402
2 2013227
3 1997108
4 201094
5 201882
6 201666
7 201665
8 201963
9 201147
10 201245
11
Inventory of microorganisms with a documented history of use in food
200241
12 200238
13 202030
14 200329
15 201827
16 202026
17 201426
18 199522
19 198821
20 201420

About Jane O’Brien

Jane O’Brien is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Rehabilitation, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Clinical Biochemistry and Occupational Therapy, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Physical Activity and Health (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (6 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (5 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (5 papers) and Advanced Glycation End Products research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (106 citations), Occupational Therapy (113 citations), Applied Psychology (109 citations), Speech and Hearing (120 citations) and Rehabilitation (114 citations). Jane O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Williams, Katie-Jane Brickwood, Greig Watson, Helen Edwards, P.A. Morrissey, Kathleen Finlayson, Graham Kerr, Steven Campbell, Stephen E. Sallan and Heather Putney. Their work appears in journals such as International Wound Journal, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, JMIR mhealth and uhealth and Journal of Wound Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026