Richard J. Schroer
- Genetics top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Roger E. StevensonCindy SkinnerCharles E. SchwartzRichard J. SimensenRon C. MichaelisMary C. PhelanSteve S. SommerJinong Feng
- Topics
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (16 papers)Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers)Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Richard J. Schroer
38 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Genetics 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 976
- Cognitive Neuroscience 795
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 228
- Clinical Biochemistry 225
Countries citing papers authored by Richard J. Schroer
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard J. Schroer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard J. Schroer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard J. Schroer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard J. Schroer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard J. Schroer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard J. Schroer. The network helps show where Richard J. Schroer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard J. Schroer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard J. Schroer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard J. Schroer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard J. Schroer. Richard J. Schroer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 176 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 86 | |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 219 | |
| 9 | 72 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 112 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | 81 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 284 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Richard J. Schroer
Richard J. Schroer is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Genetics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (16 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (795 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (225 citations). Richard J. Schroer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Roger E. Stevenson, Cindy Skinner, Charles E. Schwartz, Richard J. Simensen, Ron C. Michaelis, Mary C. Phelan, Steve S. Sommer, Jinong Feng, Yan Jin and Edwin H. Cook. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, The American Journal of Human Genetics and British Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.