Countries where authors publish in International Wound Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Wound Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Wound Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Wound Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Wound Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Wound Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Wound Journal.
About International Wound Journal
The 2.7k papers published in International Wound Journal in the last decades have received a total of 57.1k indexed citations . Papers published in International Wound Journal usually cover Occupational Therapy (976 papers), Rehabilitation (1.5k papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (709 papers), Surgery (1.3k papers) and Dermatology (233 papers) specifically the topics of Wound Healing and Treatments (1.5k papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (976 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (706 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (469 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (331 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (282 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (197 papers) and Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Wound Journal are David Leaper, Keith G Harding, Amit Gefen, David G. Armstrong, Steven L. Percival, Christina Lindholm, Richard Searle, Christine Moffatt, William V. Padula and Patricia Price.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.