International Wound Journal

3.0k papers and 51.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in International Wound Journal in the last decades have received a total of 51.6k indexed citations. Papers published in International Wound Journal usually cover Rehabilitation (1.6k papers), Surgery (1.5k papers) and Occupational Therapy (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Wound Healing and Treatments (1.5k papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (1.0k papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (736 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Wound Journal are David Leaper, Keith G Harding, Amit Gefen, David G. Armstrong, Steven L. Percival, Christina Lindholm, Richard Searle, Christine Moffatt, Patricia Price and Paul E. Banwell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Wound Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Wound Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Wound Journal.

Countries where authors publish in International Wound Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Wound Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Wound Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Wound Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025