Jane Bleasel
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 5
- Family Practice top 5%
-
- Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases 6
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 5
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 13
-
- Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 9
-
- Problem and Project Based Learning 6
-
- Hip and Femur Fractures 4
-
- Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis 4
- Co-authors
- Kathryn M. RefshaugeRob HerbertNicholas HenschkeChristopher G. MaherRobert G. CummingJames H. McAuleyAnnette BurgessEszter Kalman
- Journals
- BMC Medical Education (8 papers)Clinical Journal of Pain (2 papers)The Medical Journal of Australia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Bleasel
42 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Pharmacology 782
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 366
- Family Practice 68
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 432
- Occupational Therapy 71
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bleasel
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bleasel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bleasel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bleasel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bleasel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bleasel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bleasel. The network helps show where Jane Bleasel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Bleasel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 65 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 51 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 141 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 291 | |
| 16 | Characteristics of acute low back pain patients presenting to primary care | 2009 | 1 |
| 17 | 2009 | 305 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 37 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 43 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 7 |
About Jane Bleasel
Jane Bleasel is a scholar working on Family Practice, Medical Laboratory Technology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (13 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (9 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (6 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers) and Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (782 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (366 citations) and Family Practice (68 citations). Jane Bleasel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn M. Refshauge, Rob Herbert, Nicholas Henschke, Christopher G. Maher, Robert G. Cumming, James H. McAuley, Annette Burgess, Eszter Kalman, J. York and Arpita Das. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, Clinical Journal of Pain, The Medical Journal of Australia, Medical Teacher and Osteoporosis International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.