J. York
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Hematology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kathryn M. RefshaugeArpita DasChristopher G. MaherRobert G. CummingJane BleaselRob HerbertNicholas HenschkeJames H. McAuley
- Topics
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers)Hemophilia Treatment and Research (2 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
J. York
11 papers receiving 660 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Pharmacology 417
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 176
- Surgery 130
- Psychiatry and Mental health 98
- Hematology 94
Countries citing papers authored by J. York
This map shows the geographic impact of J. York's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. York with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. York more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. York
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. York. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. York. The network helps show where J. York may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. York
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. York. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. York based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. York. J. York is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Characteristics of acute low back pain patients presenting to primary care | 1 |
| 3 | Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort studybreakdown → | 438 |
| 4 | 86 | |
| 5 | Mycobacterium chelonae sepsis associated with long-term use of an intravenous catheter for treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum. A case report. | 12 |
| 6 | Systemic sclerosis in DRw52-positive silica-exposed males: a case report. | 2 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 6 |
About J. York
J. York is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Equine and Hematology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (2 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (417 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (18 citations) and Occupational Therapy (47 citations). J. York has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn M. Refshauge, Arpita Das, Christopher G. Maher, Robert G. Cumming, Jane Bleasel, Rob Herbert, Nicholas Henschke, James H. McAuley, Rajan Madhok and R D Sturrock. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Clinical Journal of Pain and Equine Veterinary Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.