Jan Hochweber

980 total citations
32 papers, 653 citations indexed

About

Jan Hochweber is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan Hochweber has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 653 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Education, 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jan Hochweber's work include School Choice and Performance (8 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (8 papers) and Education Methods and Technologies (7 papers). Jan Hochweber is often cited by papers focused on School Choice and Performance (8 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (8 papers) and Education Methods and Technologies (7 papers). Jan Hochweber collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Czechia. Jan Hochweber's co-authors include Eckhard Klieme, Katrin Rakoczy, Svenja Vieluf, Alexander Naumann, Johannes Hartig, Camilla Rjosk, Dirk Richter, Petra Stanat, Birgit Harks and Michael Besser and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, American Educational Research Journal and Teaching and Teacher Education.

In The Last Decade

Jan Hochweber

30 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jan Hochweber Germany 13 500 162 113 86 60 32 653
Trude Nilsen Norway 14 572 1.1× 134 0.8× 83 0.7× 103 1.2× 36 0.6× 34 737
Gabrielle M. Stanco 4 437 0.9× 118 0.7× 102 0.9× 66 0.8× 14 0.2× 7 591
Kay Brimijoin United States 4 577 1.2× 175 1.1× 62 0.5× 51 0.6× 52 0.9× 6 732
Gavin W. Fulmer United States 18 650 1.3× 195 1.2× 37 0.3× 58 0.7× 109 1.8× 52 784
Toni A. Sondergeld United States 14 424 0.8× 120 0.7× 40 0.4× 57 0.7× 19 0.3× 43 548
Jenny Lenkeit Germany 12 418 0.8× 90 0.6× 37 0.3× 34 0.4× 59 1.0× 24 550
Maria Eugénia Ferrão Portugal 12 329 0.7× 89 0.5× 71 0.6× 27 0.3× 47 0.8× 53 544
Lynn C. Hart United States 13 627 1.3× 110 0.7× 89 0.8× 56 0.7× 33 0.6× 34 737
John Nunnery United States 13 523 1.0× 238 1.5× 37 0.3× 36 0.4× 97 1.6× 40 671
Christian Bokhove United Kingdom 14 322 0.6× 154 1.0× 34 0.3× 46 0.5× 32 0.5× 55 531

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Hochweber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Hochweber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Hochweber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Hochweber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Hochweber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Hochweber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Hochweber. The network helps show where Jan Hochweber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Hochweber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Hochweber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Hochweber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Hochweber. Jan Hochweber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Hochweber, Jan, et al.. (2025). Studienbuch Empirische Bildungsforschung.
3.
Hochweber, Jan, et al.. (2024). Does teacher judgment accuracy matter? How judgment accuracy, teaching quality, and student achievement development are related. Teaching and Teacher Education. 144. 104555–104555. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hochweber, Jan, et al.. (2023). Effects of formative assessment on intrinsic motivation in primary school mathematics instruction. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 39(3). 2177–2200. 5 indexed citations
5.
Hartmann, Ulrike, et al.. (2023). Nutzung von Forschungswissen durch Lehrpersonen – Eine datengestützte Betrachtung von Nutzungsprofilen. BzL - Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. 41(2). 299–315.
6.
Naumann, Alexander, et al.. (2021). Content-specificity of teachers’ judgment accuracy regarding students’ academic achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education. 100. 103298–103298. 12 indexed citations
7.
Naumann, Alexander, Susanne Kuger, Carmen Köhler, & Jan Hochweber. (2020). Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in Detecting the Effectiveness of Learning and Teaching. Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research). 179–196. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hübner, Nicolas, Wolfgang Wagner, Jan Hochweber, Marko Neumann, & Benjamin Nagengast. (2019). Comparing apples and oranges: Curricular intensification reforms can change the meaning of students’ grades!. Journal of Educational Psychology. 112(1). 204–220. 18 indexed citations
9.
Rakoczy, Katrin, et al.. (2018). Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback's perceived usefulness and students' self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction. 60. 154–165. 105 indexed citations
10.
Naumann, Alexander, et al.. (2018). Sensitivity of test items to teaching quality. Learning and Instruction. 60. 41–53. 15 indexed citations
11.
Hochweber, Jan & Johannes Hartig. (2017). Analyzing Organizational Growth in Repeated Cross-Sectional Designs Using Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling. Methodology. 13(3). 83–97. 3 indexed citations
12.
Hochweber, Jan & Svenja Vieluf. (2016). Gender differences in reading achievement and enjoyment of reading: The role of perceived teaching quality. The Journal of Educational Research. 111(3). 268–283. 55 indexed citations
13.
Naumann, Alexander, Jan Hochweber, & Eckhard Klieme. (2016). A Psychometric Framework for the Evaluation of Instructional Sensitivity. Educational Assessment. 21(2). 89–101. 13 indexed citations
14.
Hertel, Silke, et al.. (2014). PISA 2009 Skalenhandbuch. peDOCS. 8 indexed citations
15.
Rjosk, Camilla, Dirk Richter, Jan Hochweber, et al.. (2014). Socioeconomic and language minority classroom composition and individual reading achievement: The mediating role of instructional quality. Learning and Instruction. 32. 63–72. 74 indexed citations
16.
Hochweber, Jan, et al.. (2013). Test Score or Student Progress? A Value-Added Evaluation of School Effectiveness in Urban China. Frontiers of Education in China. 8(3). 360–377. 1 indexed citations
17.
Hochweber, Jan, Ingmar Hosenfeld, & Eckhard Klieme. (2013). Classroom composition, classroom management, and the relationship between student attributes and grades.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 106(1). 289–300. 48 indexed citations
18.
Hochweber, Jan, et al.. (2012). Lehrerkooperation, Unterrichtsqualität und Lernergebnisse im Fach Englisch. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 40(4). 351–370. 4 indexed citations
19.
Rönnebeck, Silke, et al.. (2010). Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenz von PISA 2006 bis PISA 2009. peDOCS. 177–198. 6 indexed citations
20.
Hertel, Silke, et al.. (2010). Schulische Rahmenbedingungen und Lerngelegenheiten im Deutschunterricht. peDOCS. 113–151. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026