Jae H. Paik
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Kelly S. MixJane B. ChildersSusan CoureyHui LiPatricia H. MillerLoes van Rijn‐van GelderenMichael T. HayesMelissa Flores
- Topics
- Child and Animal Learning Development (8 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChild DevelopmentDevelopmental Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Jae H. Paik
18 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 176
- Education 98
- Statistics and Probability 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Jae H. Paik
This map shows the geographic impact of Jae H. Paik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jae H. Paik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jae H. Paik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jae H. Paik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jae H. Paik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jae H. Paik. The network helps show where Jae H. Paik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jae H. Paik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jae H. Paik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jae H. Paik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jae H. Paik. Jae H. Paik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 53 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 32 |
About Jae H. Paik
Jae H. Paik is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education, having authored 19 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (8 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (176 citations), Statistics and Probability (77 citations) and Music (16 citations). Jae H. Paik has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Kelly S. Mix, Jane B. Childers, Susan Courey, Hui Li, Patricia H. Miller, Loes van Rijn‐van Gelderen, Michael T. Hayes, Melissa Flores, Peter F. de Jong and Rebecca Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and Developmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.