Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Jacoby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Jacoby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Jacoby more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Jacoby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Jacoby. The network helps show where Jacob Jacoby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob Jacoby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob Jacoby.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob Jacoby based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob Jacoby. Jacob Jacoby is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jacoby, Jacob, et al.. (2006). Continuing Commercial Impression: Applications and Measurement. 10(3). 433.1 indexed citations
2.
Jacoby, Jacob. (2000). It It Rational to Assume Consumer Rationality? Some Consumer Psychological Perspectives on Rational Choice Theory. HELIN Digital Commons. 6(1). 5.7 indexed citations
3.
Mazursky, David & Jacob Jacoby. (1986). Exploring the Development of Store Images. Journal of Retailing.427 indexed citations
4.
Jacoby, Jacob & C. Samuel Craig. (1984). Personal selling : theory, research, and practice. Lexington Books.30 indexed citations
Jaccard, James & Jacob Jacoby. (1981). The sources, meaning, and validity of consumer complaint behavior: A psychological analysis. Journal of Retailing. 57. 4–24.189 indexed citations
10.
Jacoby, Jacob, Robert W. Chestnut, & Wayne D. Hoyer. (1978). Psychometric Characteristics of Behavioral Process Data: Preliminary Findings on Validity and Reliability. ACR North American Advances.17 indexed citations
11.
Jacoby, Jacob, et al.. (1978). Whether to Agree-Disagree Or Disagree-Agree: the Effects of Anchor Order on Item Response. ACR North American Advances.5 indexed citations
12.
Jacoby, Jacob. (1977). The Emerging Behavioral Process Technology in Consumer Decision-Making Research. ACR North American Advances.25 indexed citations
13.
Bettman, James R. & Jacob Jacoby. (1976). Patterns of Processing in Consumer Information Acquisition. ACR North American Advances.63 indexed citations
14.
Jacoby, Jacob. (1976). ACR Presidential Address Consumer Research: Telling It Like It Is. ACR North American Advances.5 indexed citations
15.
Jacoby, Jacob, et al.. (1976). Dissonance Resolution By Grade School Consumers. ACR North American Advances.3 indexed citations
16.
Jacoby, Jacob, et al.. (1974). Brand Choice Behavior As a Function of Information Load: Study Ii (Abstract). ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
17.
Jacoby, Jacob & Jerry C. Olson. (1974). An Extended Expectancy Model of Consumer Comparison Processes. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
18.
Jacoby, Jacob, et al.. (1972). Risk Enhancement and Risk Reduction As Strategies For Handling Perceived Risk.16 indexed citations
19.
Heimbach, James T. & Jacob Jacoby. (1972). The Zeigarnik Effect in Advertising.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.