J. van Drie

1.8k total citations
55 papers, 991 citations indexed

About

J. van Drie is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. van Drie has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 991 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Education, 37 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 19 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in J. van Drie's work include Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (37 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (14 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (9 papers). J. van Drie is often cited by papers focused on Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (37 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (14 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (9 papers). J. van Drie collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Türkiye and Ukraine. J. van Drie's co-authors include Carla van Boxtel, Gellof Kanselaar, Jos Jaspers, Gert Rijlaarsdam, Wilfried Admiraal, R. Dekker, M.A.H. Braaksma, Nico Verloop, Piet‐Hein van de Ven and Larike H. Bronkhorst and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Educational Psychology and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

J. van Drie

50 papers receiving 884 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. van Drie Netherlands 14 659 643 325 77 65 55 991
Sarah Schneider Kavanagh United States 13 991 1.5× 342 0.5× 252 0.8× 78 1.0× 34 0.5× 31 1.2k
Jeffrey John Loughran Switzerland 9 1.1k 1.7× 244 0.4× 279 0.9× 72 0.9× 34 0.5× 43 1.3k
Mark Felton United States 18 1.1k 1.7× 395 0.6× 943 2.9× 160 2.1× 50 0.8× 39 1.5k
Seth A. Parsons United States 19 930 1.4× 154 0.2× 379 1.2× 132 1.7× 34 0.5× 69 1.2k
María Varelas United States 21 966 1.5× 210 0.3× 465 1.4× 176 2.3× 54 0.8× 49 1.2k
Graham Nuthall New Zealand 17 716 1.1× 184 0.3× 301 0.9× 69 0.9× 30 0.5× 40 977
Tina L. Heafner United States 18 915 1.4× 743 1.2× 153 0.5× 54 0.7× 241 3.7× 72 1.2k
Carita Kiili Finland 20 577 0.9× 180 0.3× 520 1.6× 139 1.8× 31 0.5× 45 919
Katharine Burn United Kingdom 19 894 1.4× 233 0.4× 153 0.5× 40 0.5× 12 0.2× 49 1.0k
Leena Krokfors Finland 16 717 1.1× 193 0.3× 152 0.5× 30 0.4× 18 0.3× 35 864

Countries citing papers authored by J. van Drie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. van Drie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. van Drie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. van Drie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. van Drie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. van Drie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. van Drie. The network helps show where J. van Drie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. van Drie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. van Drie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. van Drie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. van Drie. J. van Drie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2025). Enhancing disciplinary literacy through integrated writing and process instruction: an intervention study. Reading and Writing. 39(1). 141–183.
3.
Dekker, R., et al.. (2024). Improving the quality of mathematical discussions: The impact of small-group scaffolding. Learning Culture and Social Interaction. 49. 100858–100858.
4.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2023). Writing to Learn History: An Instructional Design Study. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature. 23. 1–45. 1 indexed citations
5.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2022). Epistemic beliefs and written historical reasoning: Exploring their relationship. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 141–158. 2 indexed citations
6.
Boxtel, Carla van, et al.. (2021). Multiperspectivity in lesson designs of history teachers: The role of schoolbook texts in the design of multiperspective history lessons. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(1). Marc–Kropman. 5 indexed citations
7.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2021). Teaching historical thinking and reasoning: Teacher beliefs. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 18(1). 6 indexed citations
8.
Boxtel, Carla van, et al.. (2020). Narratives and Multiperspectivity in Dutch Secondary School History Textbooks. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 12(1). 1–23. 10 indexed citations
9.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2019). What do we know about the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of history teachers? : A review of empirical research. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 6(1). 72–95. 11 indexed citations
10.
Boxtel, Carla van, et al.. (2018). Teaching historical thinking and reasoning: Construction of an observation instrument. British Educational Research Journal. 44(6). 960–981. 41 indexed citations
11.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2017). Improving writing in social studies through professional development: Effects on teachers’ beliefs, classroom practice and students’ writing. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 5(2). 273–308. 4 indexed citations
12.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2014). Beter schrijven bij geschiedenis: effecten van schrijfinstructie op algemene tekstkwaliteit en historisch redeneren. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 15(3). 3–14. 1 indexed citations
13.
Boxtel, Carla van & J. van Drie. (2013). Historical reasoning in the classroom: What does it look like and how can we enhance it?. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2013(150). 44–52. 27 indexed citations
14.
Drie, J. van & Carla van Boxtel. (2010). Chatting about the sixties: using on-line chat discussion to improve historical reasoning in essay-writing. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 140. 38–46. 2 indexed citations
15.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2010). Een vak dat zichzelf serieus neemt…: vakdidactisch onderzoek in Nederland (eindelijk) in de lift. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 51(6). 17–21. 1 indexed citations
16.
Boxtel, Carla van, et al.. (2010). 'Het is te veel en te weinig tegelijk': de VGN-veldraadpleging centrale examinering geschiedenis havo en vwo. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 51(8). 4–6. 1 indexed citations
17.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2009). "When was that date?" Building and assessing a frame of reference in the Netherlands. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 137. 14–21. 7 indexed citations
18.
Boxtel, Carla van & J. van Drie. (2008). Vermogen tot historisch redeneren: onderliggende kennis, vaardigheden en inzichten. Hermes. 12(43). 45–54. 1 indexed citations
19.
Drie, J. van & Carla van Boxtel. (2008). Teacher strategies for fostering collaborative historical reasoning in whole-class discussions. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 147–148.
20.
Drie, J. van, et al.. (2006). Geschiedenis examineren. Rapport pilotproject CHMV-examen geschiedenis havo 2006. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026