Inge Houkes

3.0k citations
67 papers · 2.1k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Inge Houkes

65 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Inge Houkes
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 557
  • General Health Professions 921
  • Social Psychology 478
  • Research and Theory 18
  • Occupational Therapy 61
Replace Andrew Noblet with:
Andrew Noblet Australia
Karina Mostert South Africa
Frans Nijhuis Netherlands
Salla Toppinen‐Tanner Finland
Astrid M. Richardsen Norway
Alfredo Rodríguez‐Muñoz Spain
Gisela Mohr Germany
Siw Tone Innstrand Norway
Aslaug Mikkelsen Norway
Joanna Yarker United Kingdom
Inge Houkes relative to Andrew Noblet Australia Andrew Noblet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Andrew Noblet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Houkes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Houkes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Houkes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Houkes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Houkes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Houkes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Houkes. The network helps show where Inge Houkes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge Houkes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge Houkes Line = papers co-authored together Inge Houkes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003202
2 2010178
3 2012174
4 1999161
5 2011154
6 2001145
7 2003122
8 2013108
9 200167
10 200759
11 201049
12 200144
13 201943
14 200342
15 201441
16 200340
17 201438
18 202038
19 201634
20 201333

About Inge Houkes

Inge Houkes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (26 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (14 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (7 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (557 citations), General Health Professions (921 citations), Social Psychology (478 citations), Research and Theory (18 citations) and Occupational Therapy (61 citations). Inge Houkes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Taiwan and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Peter P. M. Janssen, Frans Nijhuis, Petra Verdonk, Jan de Jonge, Nicole Hoefsmit, Angelique de Rijk, Mascha Twellaar, Arnold B. Bakker, Gladys E. R. Tummers and Hans Bosma. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, European Journal of Public Health, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact