I. van den Berg
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Co-authors
- Albert PilotWilfried AdmiraalM. G. Myriam HuninkJohanna L. BoschJohannes J. DuvekotLidia R. ArendsFeikje WesseldijkFreek J. Zijlstra
- Topics
- Student Assessment and Feedback (4 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers)Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers)
- Journals
- Studies in Higher EducationAssessment & Evaluation in Higher EducationTeaching in Higher Education
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
I. van den Berg
9 papers receiving 369 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Education 307
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 75
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 59
- Complementary and alternative medicine 37
- Computer Science Applications 37
Countries citing papers authored by I. van den Berg
This map shows the geographic impact of I. van den Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. van den Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. van den Berg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I. van den Berg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. van den Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. van den Berg. The network helps show where I. van den Berg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. van den Berg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. van den Berg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. van den Berg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. van den Berg. I. van den Berg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Consumenten van Demeterproducten | 0 |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | The Contribution of Acupuncture and Moxibustion to Healthcare: an Evidence-based Approach | 2 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 85 | |
| 9 | 125 | |
| 10 | Peer assessment als leermiddel. Voorbeelden uit het hoger onderwijs | 2 |
| 11 | 146 |
About I. van den Berg
I. van den Berg is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Education, having authored 11 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Student Assessment and Feedback (4 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (307 citations), Computer Science Applications (37 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (75 citations). I. van den Berg has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Albert Pilot, Wilfried Admiraal, M. G. Myriam Hunink, Johanna L. Bosch, Johannes J. Duvekot, Lidia R. Arends, Feikje Wesseldijk, Freek J. Zijlstra, A. Cecile J.W. Janssens and Annelies E. van Ede. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Higher Education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Teaching in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.