Hugh McLeod

2.5k citations
114 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Hugh McLeod

91 papers receiving 899 citations

Peers

Hugh McLeod
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • General Health Professions 359
  • Health Information Management 63
  • History 98
  • Health 74
  • Religious studies 38
Replace S. E. D. Shortt with:
S. E. D. Shortt Canada
Graham Mooney United Kingdom
Hugh Armstrong Canada
Evelyn L. Forget Canada
Anna Winterbottom United Kingdom
Rebecca J. Cook Canada
Philip Strong United Kingdom
George A. Silver United States
Milton I. Roemer United States
Ailsa Cameron United Kingdom
Hugh McLeod relative to S. E. D. Shortt Canada S. E. D. Shortt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
S. E. D. Shortt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh McLeod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh McLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh McLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh McLeod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh McLeod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh McLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh McLeod. The network helps show where Hugh McLeod may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hugh McLeod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hugh McLeod Line = papers co-authored together Hugh McLeod links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20241
4 20241
5 20245
6 20241
7 20238
8 20233
9 20234
10 20234
11 20229
12
International religious networks
20122
13 20071
14 20071
15 20051
16 20051
17 20041
18
Developing primary care in the new NHS: lessons from total purchasing
199910
19
Contracting by total purchasing pilot projects 1997-1998
19989
20
Secularisation and revival in the 19th century city
19901

About Hugh McLeod

Hugh McLeod is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geography, Planning and Development, History, Economics and Econometrics and Religious studies, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (12 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Global Health Care Issues (7 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (7 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (359 citations), Health Information Management (63 citations), History (98 citations), Health (74 citations) and Religious studies (38 citations). Hugh McLeod has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Kipping, Louise Jackson, Chris Ham, Tuba Saygın Avşar, Nick Goodwin, Peter Marsh, Ross Millar, Lazaros Andronis, Joanne Greenhalgh and Justin Avery Aunger. Their work appears in journals such as Church History, BMJ Open, The English Historical Review, PLoS ONE and BDJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026