Amanda Porterfield
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Health top 5%
- History top 1%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ann TavesCatherine A. BrekusConrad CherryGeorge M. MarsdenBetty A. DeBergJohn D. CorriganCarla Gardina PestanaJoan Rubin
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (26 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers)Mormonism, Religion, and History (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Religious studiesHealthHistory
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of American HistoryThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesMexico
In The Last Decade
Amanda Porterfield
44 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Sociology and Political Science 241
- Political Science and International Relations 137
- Health 107
- History 101
- Religious studies 65
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Porterfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Porterfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Porterfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Porterfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Porterfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Porterfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Porterfield. The network helps show where Amanda Porterfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Porterfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Porterfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Porterfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Porterfield. Amanda Porterfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Bebbington's Approach to Evangelical Christianity as a Pioneering Effort In Lived Religion | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Religion in American history | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | The power of religion : a comparative introduction | 2 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Amanda Porterfield
Amanda Porterfield is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and Religious studies, having authored 52 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (26 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers) and Mormonism, Religion, and History (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (65 citations), Health (107 citations) and History (101 citations). Amanda Porterfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Ann Taves, Catherine A. Brekus, Conrad Cherry, George M. Marsden, Betty A. DeBerg, John D. Corrigan, Carla Gardina Pestana, Joan Rubin, Jonathan D. Sarna and Phillip E. Hammond. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.