Peter Marsh

1.3k citations
47 papers · 583 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Marsh

40 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Peter Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Public Administration 37
  • Political Science and International Relations 241
  • History 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 217
  • Safety Research 35
Replace T. Dunbar Moodie with:
T. Dunbar Moodie United States
Linda Kealey Canada
Keith Breckenridge South Africa
Sangeeta Kamat United States
Laureen Snider Canada
Nancy MacLean United States
John S. Brubacher United States
Sverre Raffnsøe Denmark
Jason Edwards United States
Ava Baron United States
Peter Marsh relative to T. Dunbar Moodie United States T. Dunbar Moodie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
T. Dunbar Moodie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Marsh. The network helps show where Peter Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Marsh Line = papers co-authored together Peter Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989104
2
Family Group Conferences in Child Welfare
199882
3 198351
4 197637
5 197430
6 197927
7 199421
8 197218
9 197517
10 197715
11 197913
12 199913
13 201712
14 197011
15 198011
16 199911
17 197210
18 198010
19 20138
20 19698

About Peter Marsh

Peter Marsh is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (37 citations), Political Science and International Relations (241 citations), History (92 citations), Sociology and Political Science (217 citations) and Safety Research (35 citations). Peter Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gary W. Cox, Hugh McLeod, Peter Collett, Martha Vicinus, Walter L. Arnstein, Desmond Bowen, Joan S. Stark, Ann Rippin, Robert Blake and Iain MacRury. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, American Journal of Legal History, Political Science Quarterly and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact