The English Historical Review

4.1k papers and 16.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.1k papers published in The English Historical Review in the last decades have received a total of 16.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The English Historical Review usually cover History (1.7k papers), Political Science and International Relations (864 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (793 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (604 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (564 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (539 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The English Historical Review are Ross McKibbin, Richard Reid, Barry Supple, G. V. Scammell, Arthur Marwick, Donna Read, Julian Hoppit, J. R. Maddicott, Alan O’Day and Ian Phimister.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The English Historical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The English Historical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The English Historical Review.

Countries where authors publish in The English Historical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The English Historical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The English Historical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The English Historical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025