Philip Strong

1.6k total citations
35 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Philip Strong is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Strong has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Philip Strong's work include Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers). Philip Strong is often cited by papers focused on Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers). Philip Strong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Philip Strong's co-authors include Jane Robinson, Klim McPherson, Arnold M. Epstein, Lesley Jones, Alan Davis, Whitney Chadwick, Birju Patel, Erika A. Saliba‐Gustafsson, David K. Vawdrey and Natalie M. Pageler and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health and Journal of Health and Social Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Philip Strong

35 papers receiving 939 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Strong United Kingdom 15 437 218 174 168 151 35 1.1k
Carolyn L. Wiener United States 15 573 1.3× 328 1.5× 180 1.0× 74 0.4× 138 0.9× 27 1.3k
Luther P. Christman United States 19 642 1.5× 172 0.8× 227 1.3× 93 0.6× 168 1.1× 178 1.4k
Herbert C. Northcott Canada 23 503 1.2× 330 1.5× 223 1.3× 160 1.0× 205 1.4× 62 1.4k
Jill Russell United Kingdom 20 701 1.6× 141 0.6× 204 1.2× 162 1.0× 59 0.4× 35 1.2k
Susan Pickard United Kingdom 24 870 2.0× 251 1.2× 182 1.0× 246 1.5× 86 0.6× 69 1.5k
William L. Kissick United States 11 364 0.8× 88 0.4× 111 0.6× 199 1.2× 75 0.5× 30 913
Melinda M. Swenson United States 12 531 1.2× 222 1.0× 294 1.7× 54 0.3× 204 1.4× 22 1.4k
Karen Lutfey United States 19 603 1.4× 199 0.9× 233 1.3× 118 0.7× 229 1.5× 35 1.4k
Stanley Reiser United States 19 826 1.9× 223 1.0× 588 3.4× 164 1.0× 194 1.3× 95 1.9k
J. Enoch Powell United Kingdom 11 471 1.1× 178 0.8× 313 1.8× 72 0.4× 226 1.5× 40 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Strong. The network helps show where Philip Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Strong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Strong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Strong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Strong. Philip Strong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vilendrer, Stacie, Birju Patel, Whitney Chadwick, et al.. (2020). Rapid Deployment of Inpatient Telemedicine In Response to COVID-19 Across Three Health Systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 27(7). 1102–1109. 68 indexed citations
2.
Liu, Lisa Grossman, Sung Won Choi, Patricia C. Dykes, et al.. (2017). Implementation of acute care patient portals: recommendations on utility and use from six early adopters. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 25(4). 370–379. 45 indexed citations
3.
Creber, Ruth Masterson, Jennifer E. Prey, Min Qian, et al.. (2016). Engaging hospitalized patients in clinical care: Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 47. 165–171. 29 indexed citations
4.
Vaish, Rajan, et al.. (2013). Digitization of health records in rural villages. 321. 209–214. 5 indexed citations
5.
Strong, Philip, et al.. (2008). Pre-triage procedures in mobile rural health clinics in Ethiopia. Rural and Remote Health. 8(3). 955–955. 4 indexed citations
6.
Wester, Ronald C., Xiaoying Hui, Howard I. Maibach, et al.. (1998). In vivo percutaneous absorption of boron as boric acid, borax, and disodium octaborate tetrahydrate in humans. Biological Trace Element Research. 66(1-3). 101–109. 13 indexed citations
7.
Wester, Ronald C., Xiaoying Hui, Howard I. Maïbach, et al.. (1998). In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption of Boric Acid, Borax, and Disodium Octaborate Tetrahydrate in Humans Compared to in Vitro Absorption in Human Skin from Infinite and Finite Doses. Toxicological Sciences. 45(1). 42–51. 1 indexed citations
8.
Berridge, Virgínia & Philip Strong. (1991). AIDS and the Relevance of History. Social History of Medicine. 4(1). 129–138. 6 indexed citations
9.
Strong, Philip & Jane Robinson. (1990). The NHS under new management.. Open University Press eBooks. 86 indexed citations
10.
Strong, Philip. (1990). Epidemic psychology: a model. Sociology of Health & Illness. 12(3). 249–259. 170 indexed citations
11.
Strong, Philip. (1990). Black on class and mortality: theory, method and history *. Journal of Public Health. 12(3-4). 168–180. 16 indexed citations
12.
Robinson, Jane & Philip Strong. (1987). Professional nursing advice after Griffiths - an interim report. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 9 indexed citations
13.
Strong, Philip. (1984). Viewpoint: the academic encirclement of medicine?. Sociology of Health & Illness. 6(3). 339–358. 20 indexed citations
14.
Black, Nick & Philip Strong. (1982). Prevention: who needs it?. BMJ. 285(6354). 1543–1544. 3 indexed citations
15.
Strong, Philip. (1981). The Clinical Experience: The Construction and Reconstruction of Medical Reality. Sociology. 15(3). 459–460. 81 indexed citations
16.
Strong, Philip. (1980). On Method of Payment for Medical Care and Public Attitudes toward Physician Authority. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 21(2). 195–195. 2 indexed citations
17.
Strong, Philip. (1980). Doctors and dirty work—the case of alcoholism*. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2(1). 24–47. 59 indexed citations
18.
Strong, Philip. (1979). Materialism and medical interaction: A critique of “medicine, superstructure and micropolitics”. Social Science & Medicine Part A Medical Sociology. 13(6). 613–619. 7 indexed citations
19.
Strong, Philip. (1979). Sociological imperialism and the profession of medicine A critical examination of the thesis of medical imperialism. Social Science & Medicine Part A Medical Sociology. 13(2). 199–215. 96 indexed citations
20.
Davis, Alan & Philip Strong. (1974). Aren't Children Wonderful?—A Study of the Allocation of Identity in Development Assessment. The Sociological Review. 22(1_suppl). 156–175. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026