Countries citing papers authored by Hans O. Andersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans O. Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans O. Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans O. Andersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans O. Andersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans O. Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans O. Andersen. The network helps show where Hans O. Andersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans O. Andersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans O. Andersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans O. Andersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hans O. Andersen. Hans O. Andersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
MaKinster, James G., Sasha A. Barab, William Harwood, & Hans O. Andersen. (2006). The Effect of Social Context on the Reflective Practice of Preservice Science Teachers: Incorporating a Web-Supported Community of Teachers. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 14(3). 543–579.42 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.