Graham G. Scott
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sara C. SerenoPatrick O’DonnellHartmut LeutholdBo YaoChristopher J. HandTracii RyanDmitri RozgonjukAnne Keitel
- Topics
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents (11 papers)Media Influence and Health (7 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyCognitive NeuroscienceDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaGreece
In The Last Decade
Graham G. Scott
32 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 466
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 356
- Sociology and Political Science 351
- Social Psychology 244
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 187
Countries citing papers authored by Graham G. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham G. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham G. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham G. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham G. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham G. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham G. Scott. The network helps show where Graham G. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham G. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham G. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham G. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham G. Scott. Graham G. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Facebook reactions: how are they used and which personality factors predict their use? | 1 |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 134 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 86 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 340 |
About Graham G. Scott
Graham G. Scott is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (11 papers), Media Influence and Health (7 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (356 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (466 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (187 citations). Graham G. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Sara C. Sereno, Patrick O’Donnell, Hartmut Leuthold, Bo Yao, Christopher J. Hand, Tracii Ryan, Dmitri Rozgonjuk, Anne Keitel, Jon D. Elhai and Claire Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.