Gloria Jacobs

32 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Gloria Jacobs
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Literature and Literary Theory 111
  • Speech and Hearing 41
  • Communication 40
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Gender Studies 50
Replace Gary B. Moorman with:
Gary B. Moorman United States
Erica C. Boling United States
Stuart Greene United States
Leila Christenbury United States
Catherine Compton‐Lilly United States
Miika Marttunen Finland
Roger Jon Desmond United States
Charmian Kenner United Kingdom
Michael Kompf Canada
Lynn Z. Bloom United States
Gloria Jacobs relative to Gary B. Moorman United States Gary B. Moorman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Gary B. Moorman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gloria Jacobs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gloria Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gloria Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gloria Jacobs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gloria Jacobs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gloria Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gloria Jacobs. The network helps show where Gloria Jacobs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Gloria Jacobs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gloria Jacobs Line = papers co-authored together Gloria Jacobs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Re-Making Love: The Feminization of Sex
198678
2 200426
3 198823
4 200622
5 201922
6 201320
7 201320
8 201419
9 200817
10
Collaborative electronic network building
199514
11 201314
12 201212
13 201311
14 198611
15 201210
16 201810
17 20107
18
Active Readers--What Benefits Do They Gain from an Educational Telecommunications Network?
19955
19 20215
20 20134

About Gloria Jacobs

Gloria Jacobs is a scholar working on Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Speech and Hearing, having authored 35 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literacy, Media, and Education (10 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Digital literacy in education (5 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (4 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers) and Web and Library Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations), Speech and Hearing (41 citations), Communication (40 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations) and Gender Studies (50 citations). Gloria Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Ehrenreich, Elizabeth P. Hess, Jill Castek, Kathy Harris, Julie A. Reeder, Stephen Reder, Edward Britton, Mary Ann Huntley, Susan M. Schultz and Judy Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, ELT Journal, Journal of Research in Reading, Rural Special Education Quarterly and Reading Research Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact