Journal of Research in Reading

957 papers and 21.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 957 papers published in Journal of Research in Reading in the last decades have received a total of 21.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Research in Reading usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (821 papers), Education (440 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (206 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (756 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (169 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Research in Reading are Margaret J. Snowling, Linnea C. Ehri, Kate Nation, Kit‐ling Lau, Virginia Clinton‐Lisell, Clare Wood, Roel van Steensel, S. Hélène Deacon, Yaacov Petscher and Robert Savage.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Research in Reading

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Research in Reading. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Research in Reading.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Research in Reading

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Research in Reading. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Research in Reading with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Research in Reading more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025