Giles St J. Burch

21 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Giles St J. Burch
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
  • Social Psychology 188
  • Clinical Psychology 186
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 151
  • Information Systems 139
Replace Constantinos Halkiopoulos with:
Constantinos Halkiopoulos Greece
Inmaculada Fajardo Spain
David J. Pittenger United States
Albert Ziegler Germany
Thomas Ellwart Germany
Evgenia Gkintoni Greece
Rayne Sperling Dennison United States
Christiaan Hamaker Netherlands
Alvin Y. Wang United States
Chara Papoutsi Greece
Giles St J. Burch relative to Constantinos Halkiopoulos Greece Constantinos Halkiopoulos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×49×
Constantinos Halkiopoulos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giles St J. Burch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giles St J. Burch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles St J. Burch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles St J. Burch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giles St J. Burch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles St J. Burch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles St J. Burch. The network helps show where Giles St J. Burch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giles St J. Burch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giles St J. Burch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giles St J. Burch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giles St J. Burch. Giles St J. Burch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 68
3 8
4 4
5 3
6 43
7 16
8 34
9 57
10
An anti-social personality for an anti-social habit?: The relationship between multi-dimensio- nal schizotypy, "normal" personality, and cigarette smoking
6
11 2
12 17
13 121
14
Education for a career in human resource management
2
15 125
16 48
17 16
18 18
19 43
20 63

About Giles St J. Burch

Giles St J. Burch is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations), Computer Science Applications (68 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (111 citations). Giles St J. Burch has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony S. David, Hwee Sing Khoo, Philip J. Corr, John Grundy, Norsaremah Salleh, Emília Mendes, Neil Anderson, Craig Steel, Iain A. McCormick and Arjumand Bano Soomro. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, British Journal of Psychology and Information and Software Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026