Thomas Ellwart

1.4k total citations
50 papers, 911 citations indexed

About

Thomas Ellwart is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Ellwart has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 911 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Social Psychology, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 12 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Thomas Ellwart's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (16 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers). Thomas Ellwart is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (16 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers). Thomas Ellwart collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Thomas Ellwart's co-authors include Mike Rinck, Eni S. Becker, Udo Konradt, Andrea Reinecke, Conny H. Antoni, Andrea Gurtner, Christian Happ, Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, Annette Kluge and Franzis Preckel and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Ellwart

46 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Ellwart Germany 17 300 271 268 157 133 50 911
Willem J. M. I. Verbeke Netherlands 15 292 1.0× 202 0.7× 309 1.2× 232 1.5× 195 1.5× 31 1.1k
N. Kyle Smith United States 4 384 1.3× 423 1.6× 819 3.1× 90 0.6× 402 3.0× 5 1.7k
Eran Chajut Israel 17 296 1.0× 442 1.6× 645 2.4× 32 0.2× 163 1.2× 28 1.5k
Martin Storme France 22 338 1.1× 741 2.7× 289 1.1× 111 0.7× 129 1.0× 60 1.2k
Jianjun Zhu United States 23 442 1.5× 179 0.7× 559 2.1× 45 0.3× 467 3.5× 38 1.7k
Henrik Hagtvedt United States 21 550 1.8× 370 1.4× 373 1.4× 167 1.1× 399 3.0× 40 1.6k
Ravi Mehta United States 13 566 1.9× 475 1.8× 212 0.8× 54 0.3× 192 1.4× 24 1.2k
Sam J. Maglio Canada 19 425 1.4× 411 1.5× 386 1.4× 61 0.4× 342 2.6× 47 1.5k
Yu‐chu Yeh Taiwan 23 285 0.9× 379 1.4× 133 0.5× 36 0.2× 107 0.8× 58 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ellwart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ellwart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ellwart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ellwart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ellwart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ellwart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ellwart. The network helps show where Thomas Ellwart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Ellwart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Ellwart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Ellwart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Ellwart. Thomas Ellwart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellwart, Thomas, et al.. (2025). Is it me or is it us – Effect of agent autonomy on perceptions as a team. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 19. 100701–100701.
3.
Ellwart, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Context-dependent preferences for a decision support system's level of automation. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 13. 100350–100350. 2 indexed citations
4.
Antoni, Conny H., et al.. (2023). Effects of automated communication on team members’ activity and social presence awareness, commitment, and motivation in human-autonomy teams. Computers in Human Behavior. 149. 107925–107925. 5 indexed citations
5.
Ellwart, Thomas, et al.. (2022). I vs. robot: Sociodigital self-comparisons in hybrid teams from a theoretical, empirical, and practical perspective. Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO). 53(3). 273–284. 2 indexed citations
6.
Schmidt, Isabelle, et al.. (2021). Self-concept related to information and communication technology: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 4. 100149–100149. 22 indexed citations
7.
Ellwart, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Threats to Professional Roles in Part-Time Leadership. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O. 66(1). 1–13. 1 indexed citations
8.
Timm, Ingo J., et al.. (2019). Analyzing the Effects of Role Configuration in Logistics Processes using Multiagent-Based Simulation: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 4 indexed citations
9.
Ellwart, Thomas & Annette Kluge. (2018). Psychological Perspectives on Intentional Forgetting: An Overview of Concepts and Literature. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz. 33(1). 79–84. 11 indexed citations
10.
Ulfert, Anna‐Sophie, et al.. (2018). Intentional Forgetting in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz. 33(1). 69–77. 1 indexed citations
11.
Biemann, Torsten, et al.. (2013). Quantifying similarity of team mental models: An introduction of the r rg index. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 17(1). 125–140. 7 indexed citations
12.
Konradt, Udo, et al.. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of team learning on team outcomes: A multiple mediator analysis.. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice. 17(4). 232–251. 18 indexed citations
13.
Konradt, Udo, et al.. (2013). Fairness Perceptions in Web‐based Selection: Impact on applicants’ pursuit intentions, recommendation intentions, and intentions to reapply. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 21(2). 155–169. 34 indexed citations
14.
Ellwart, Thomas & Udo Konradt. (2011). Formative Versus Reflective Measurement: An Illustration Using Work–Family Balance. The Journal of Psychology. 145(5). 391–417. 42 indexed citations
15.
Woud, Marcella L., Thomas Ellwart, Oliver Langner, Mike Rinck, & Eni S. Becker. (2010). Task-irrelevant spider associations affect categorization performance. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 42(3). 309–316. 2 indexed citations
16.
Ellwart, Thomas, Mike Rinck, & Eni S. Becker. (2006). From fear to love: Individual differences in implicit spider associations.. Emotion. 6(1). 18–27. 38 indexed citations
17.
Rinck, Mike, et al.. (2005). Speeded Detection and Increased Distraction in Fear of Spiders: Evidence From Eye Movements.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 114(2). 235–248. 132 indexed citations
18.
Ellwart, Thomas, Eni S. Becker, & Mike Rinck. (2004). Activation and measurement of threat associations in fear of spiders: an application of the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 36(4). 281–299. 28 indexed citations
19.
Rinck, Mike & Thomas Ellwart. (2004). Repetition priming during the use and recall of numerical keypads. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 16(6). 841–861. 2 indexed citations
20.
Ellwart, Thomas, Mike Rinck, & Eni S. Becker. (2003). Selective memory and memory deficits in depressed inpatients. Depression and Anxiety. 17(4). 197–206. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026