Thomas Ellwart
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mike RinckEni S. BeckerUdo KonradtAndrea ReineckeConny H. AntoniAndrea GurtnerChristian HappAnna‐Sophie Ulfert
- Topics
- Team Dynamics and Performance (16 papers)Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Sensory SystemsExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas Ellwart
46 papers receiving 869 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Social Psychology 300
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 271
- Cognitive Neuroscience 268
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 157
- Sociology and Political Science 133
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ellwart
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ellwart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ellwart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ellwart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ellwart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ellwart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ellwart. The network helps show where Thomas Ellwart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Ellwart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Ellwart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Ellwart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Ellwart. Thomas Ellwart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 132 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About Thomas Ellwart
Thomas Ellwart is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 50 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (16 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (102 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (271 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (157 citations). Thomas Ellwart has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mike Rinck, Eni S. Becker, Udo Konradt, Andrea Reinecke, Conny H. Antoni, Andrea Gurtner, Christian Happ, Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, Annette Kluge and Franzis Preckel. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.