G. G. Stewart
- Co-authors
- J. H. BryceDaniel CooperI. RussellTony D’AmoreC. PanchalAnthony H. RoseXuxu ZhengRandy M. Jones
- Topics
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (11 papers)Biofuel production and bioconversion (5 papers)Food Quality and Safety Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of MicrobiologyInternational Biodeterioration & BiodegradationBiotechnology Letters
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
G. G. Stewart
17 papers receiving 396 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Molecular Biology 272
- Food Science 271
- Plant Science 132
- Biomedical Engineering 125
- Biotechnology 55
Countries citing papers authored by G. G. Stewart
This map shows the geographic impact of G. G. Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. G. Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. G. Stewart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. G. Stewart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. G. Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. G. Stewart. The network helps show where G. G. Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. G. Stewart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. G. Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. G. Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. G. Stewart. G. G. Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Importance of Free Amino Nitrogen in Wort and Beer | 41 |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | The control of ester synthesis during wort fermentation | 3 |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | Bacterial-induced flocculation in selected brewing strains of Saccharomyces | 6 |
| 9 | Factors that influence the ethanol tolerance of brewer's yeast strains during high gravity wort fermentations | 23 |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | Genetic manipulation of brewing and related yeast strains | 33 |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 20 |
About G. G. Stewart
G. G. Stewart is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Biotechnology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (11 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (5 papers) and Food Quality and Safety Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (271 citations), Biotechnology (55 citations) and Molecular Biology (272 citations). G. G. Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. H. Bryce, Daniel Cooper, I. Russell, I. Russell, Tony D’Amore, C. Panchal, Anthony H. Rose, Xuxu Zheng, Randy M. Jones and J. T. Trevors. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Microbiology, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation and Biotechnology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.