F. Shama

816 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 616 citations indexed

About

F. Shama is a scholar working on Food Science, Mechanics of Materials and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Shama has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 616 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Food Science, 2 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 2 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in F. Shama's work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (5 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (2 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers). F. Shama is often cited by papers focused on Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (5 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (2 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers). F. Shama collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Mexico. F. Shama's co-authors include P. Sherman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Food Science, Journal of Texture Studies and Biorheology.

In The Last Decade

F. Shama

8 papers receiving 576 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

IDENTIFICATION OF STIMULI CONTROLLING THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF VISCOSITY II. Oral Methods

1973 323 citations F. Shama, P. Sherman Journal of Texture Studies profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. Shama United Kingdom	7	436	176	116	48	47	8	616
BIRGER DRAKE Sweden	11	244 0.6×	155 0.9×	75 0.6×	9 0.2×	76 1.6×	26	516
Michael W. Boehm Australia	13	425 1.0×	224 1.3×	100 0.9×	59 1.2×	61 1.3×	30	930
M.E.J. Terpstra Netherlands	7	327 0.8×	189 1.1×	95 0.8×	11 0.2×	17 0.4×	8	390
H. Luyten Netherlands	17	756 1.7×	388 2.2×	150 1.3×	11 0.2×	163 3.5×	27	1.0k
Esra Çakır United States	6	380 0.9×	162 0.9×	61 0.5×	33 0.7×	28 0.6×	9	475
Ana Carolina Mosca Netherlands	15	412 0.9×	357 2.0×	142 1.2×	44 0.9×	32 0.7×	22	719
Kylie D. Foster New Zealand	18	658 1.5×	310 1.8×	81 0.7×	164 3.4×	40 0.9×	22	1.2k
Anne-Laure Réguerre France	16	473 1.1×	495 2.8×	71 0.6×	27 0.6×	61 1.3×	27	913
S. Lagarrigue France	7	238 0.5×	225 1.3×	30 0.3×	18 0.4×	39 0.8×	8	344
Frits Bosman Netherlands	10	238 0.5×	172 1.0×	72 0.6×	23 0.5×	17 0.4×	10	659

Countries citing papers authored by F. Shama

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Shama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Shama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Shama more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Shama

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Shama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Shama. The network helps show where F. Shama may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Shama

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Shama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Shama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Shama. F. Shama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Shama, F. & P. Sherman. (1974). Lingual pressure associated with oral evaluation of viscosity. Biorheology. 11(6). 453–456. 5 indexed citations

2.

Shama, F. & P. Sherman. (1973). IDENTIFICATION OF STIMULI CONTROLLING THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF VISCOSITY II. Oral Methods. Journal of Texture Studies. 4(1). 111–118. 323 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Shama, F. & P. Sherman. (1973). VARIATION IN STIMULI ASSOCIATED WITH ORAL EVALUATION OF THE VISCOSITIES OF GLUCOSE SOLUTIONS. Journal of Texture Studies. 4(2). 254–262. 22 indexed citations

4.

Shama, F. & P. Sherman. (1973). EVALUATION OF SOME TEXTURAL PROPERTIES OF FOODS WITH THE INSTRON UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINE. Journal of Texture Studies. 4(3). 344–352. 102 indexed citations

5.

Shama, F. & P. Sherman. (1973). STRESS RELAXATION DURING FORCE‐COMPRESSION STUDIES ON FOODS WITH THE INSTRON UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS. Journal of Texture Studies. 4(3). 353–362. 35 indexed citations

6.

Shama, F., et al.. (1973). IDENTIFICATION OF STIMULI CONTROLLING THE SENSORY EVALUATION OF VISCOSITY I. Non‐Oral Methods. Journal of Texture Studies. 4(1). 102–110. 59 indexed citations

7.

Shama, F. & P. Sherman. (1970). THE INFLUENCE OF WORK SOFTENING ON THE VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES OF BUTTER AND MARGARINE. Journal of Texture Studies. 1(2). 196–205. 37 indexed citations

8.

Shama, F. & P. Sherman. (1966). The Texture of Ice Cream 2. Rheological Properties of Frozen Ice Cream. Journal of Food Science. 31(5). 699–706. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact