E.O. Schild

668 total citations
14 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

E.O. Schild is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Communication and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, E.O. Schild has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2 papers in Communication and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in E.O. Schild's work include Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). E.O. Schild is often cited by papers focused on Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). E.O. Schild collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. E.O. Schild's co-authors include James S. Coleman, Sarane Spence Boocock, Simon N. Herman, Vered Kraus, Robert W. Hodge, Julian C. Stanley, Daniel Kahneman, Mona Kyndi Pedersen and Kaare Svalastoga and has published in prestigious journals such as American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology and Social Forces.

In The Last Decade

E.O. Schild

14 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E.O. Schild United States 9 131 128 93 68 48 14 451
M. Ray Loree United States 4 292 2.2× 48 0.4× 126 1.4× 44 0.6× 12 0.3× 6 573
Oren Harari United States 7 82 0.6× 63 0.5× 63 0.7× 102 1.5× 31 0.6× 18 330
Alfred E. Goldman United States 9 44 0.3× 145 1.1× 29 0.3× 37 0.5× 20 0.4× 15 422
Ronald B. Adler United States 9 100 0.8× 110 0.9× 31 0.3× 193 2.8× 80 1.7× 10 530
John D. McNeil United States 14 417 3.2× 132 1.0× 162 1.7× 49 0.7× 11 0.2× 44 737
Marguerite G. Lodico Canada 5 365 2.8× 57 0.4× 164 1.8× 51 0.8× 16 0.3× 7 635
Egerton L. Ballachey United States 4 69 0.5× 184 1.4× 21 0.2× 121 1.8× 21 0.4× 5 497
Joseph Weitz United States 13 39 0.3× 82 0.6× 34 0.4× 160 2.4× 17 0.4× 24 530
Paul B. Pederson United States 4 91 0.7× 106 0.8× 24 0.3× 125 1.8× 54 1.1× 7 355
Arthur L. Korotkin United States 4 41 0.3× 50 0.4× 26 0.3× 152 2.2× 44 0.9× 6 411

Countries citing papers authored by E.O. Schild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.O. Schild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.O. Schild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.O. Schild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.O. Schild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.O. Schild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.O. Schild. The network helps show where E.O. Schild may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.O. Schild

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.O. Schild. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.O. Schild based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E.O. Schild. E.O. Schild is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Hodge, Robert W., Vered Kraus, & E.O. Schild. (1982). Consensus in Occupational Prestige Ratings: Response to Guppy. Social Forces. 60(4). 1190–1196. 13 indexed citations
2.
Kraus, Vered, E.O. Schild, & Robert W. Hodge. (1978). Occupational Prestige in the Collective Conscience. Social Forces. 56(3). 900–918. 48 indexed citations
3.
Boocock, Sarane Spence, E.O. Schild, & James S. Coleman. (1973). Simulation Games in Learning. Simulation & Games. 4(2). 144–144. 34 indexed citations
4.
Boocock, Sarane Spence, E.O. Schild, & James S. Coleman. (1973). Simulation Games in Learning. Simulation & Games. 4(2). 204–204. 231 indexed citations
5.
Stanley, Julian C. & E.O. Schild. (1971). Do Nonsimulation Games Raise IQ's, Whereas Simulation Games Do Not?. Simulation & Games. 2(1). 119–123. 4 indexed citations
7.
Schild, E.O.. (1966). The Shaping of Strategies. American Behavioral Scientist. 10(3). 1–4. 15 indexed citations
8.
Schild, E.O., et al.. (1966). Pressures and Defenses in Bureaucratic Roles. American Journal of Sociology. 71(6). 665–673. 8 indexed citations
9.
Kahneman, Daniel & E.O. Schild. (1966). Training Agents of Social Change in Israel: Definition of Objectives and a Training Approach. Human Organization. 25(1). 71–77. 4 indexed citations
10.
Schild, E.O.. (1962). The Foreign Student, as Stranger, Learning the Norms of the Host‐Culture. Journal of Social Issues. 18(1). 41–54. 44 indexed citations
11.
Herman, Simon N. & E.O. Schild. (1961). The Stranger-Group in a Cross-Cultural Situation. Sociometry. 24(2). 165–165. 26 indexed citations
12.
Herman, Simon N. & E.O. Schild. (1960). Contexts for the Study of Cross-Cultural Education. The Journal of Social Psychology. 52(2). 231–250. 10 indexed citations
13.
Herman, Simon N. & E.O. Schild. (1960). Ethnic Role Conflict in a Cross-cultural Situation. Human Relations. 13(3). 215–228. 10 indexed citations
14.
Svalastoga, Kaare, et al.. (1956). Differential Class Behavior in Denmark. American Sociological Review. 21(4). 435–435. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026